I'd like the thought that due to how it's situated the tank mimics a natural cycle.
I'd have to search for it again, but I read a study at one point regarding fish's response to pH changes from natural causes, including significant pH drops after heavy rains, studying what they can handle without evidence of stress, etc. In the (riverine) habitats they studied, fish were far more resilient to pH changes, including relatively quick changes after a storm, than some hobby lore would have us believe-- not to say they're impervious, one object of the study was to note the limits at which they did show stress, even in their native environment.
Personally, as I've kept fish in varying conditions over the years (for varying reasons) I've noted what appears to be evidence that keeping some species near enough to their probable limit of pH tolerance (not meaning
at their limit) may shorten their lifespan somewhat, despite being healthy, active, producing healthy fry, etc. all the while. I wouldn't call it scientific, just observation over the years, but my hypothesis is there's a long term range of conditions within which a species can live long, comfortable lives, a wider range within which they can live healthy but somewhat shorter lives, then outside this range where they're increasingly prone to stress or illness.
...Over the years I've adjusted accordingly to such observations, sometimes loosening up, sometimes tightening up-- depending on which phase of fishkeeping I'd been in at the time.
A field example I know of, though more about temperature than pH, would be S. haraldi discus, Bleher has documented finding them in water in the lower 70s (seasonal), but also said they looked less robust at the lower end of such temperatures.