Hi,
A couple things - what is the point that we are missing? I keep re-reading your original post, and am not sure what we missed.
Now to the fish - how can you be sure they are not eating shrimp? There is an invasive bright red shrimp there that fish are feeding on. How can you be sure that this is genetic?
I'm from a similar background as you, so I am genuinely curious how you came to these conclusions.
hi Jude - please see my above response to Amy as the diet item and "main point" issues are discussed there too.
1 - the point was that i don't think any of the fishes are true erythristics, and i wanted to see what others thought and get discussion going. those were the main points.
2 - i'm sure they are not eating shrimp because we looked at the diets of these fishes...and there are no shrimp in these habitats. there are crayfish in some, but they don't often overlap with the habitats where we find the gars (unlike in the south, there there is considerable overlap). those main points and i'm sure other analytical details i am forgetting to list are why i'm confident they are not eating shrimp (keep in mind our main focus was the MI population...they are inland, so we aren't dealing with any mysids or hemimysis, etc...not all MI fishes are directly connected with the Great Lakes).
3 - as per comments in my response to Amy, i strongly believe there is a high degree of genetic influence but also environmental...this has been directly observed when we take fish out of those environments and the patterns fade...this can also be enhanced or faded to some degree even in individuals where there is a stronger genetic component. again, it's a combination of several factors.
hopefully that gets at why we came to these conclusions, but since you are of similar background, i'd be happy to discuss things in greater detail provided you have more specific questions. i'm curious as to your similar background as well in case you'd like to share--
--solomon