When you look at the situation and research what happened it quickly becomes apparent that:
A. This guy was a nutbag
B. Everyone new it and did almost nothing about it.
C. He violated every law but it didn't make a difference because the sheriff wasn't in the habit of enforcing the laws.
The whole trip Jack Hanna is on is kinda redundant, had the state and local authorities done their jobs he wouldn't have still possessed the animals and couldn't have released them. In this case more laws probably wouldn't have stopped him because the sheriff wasn't enforcing what he had already. I'd be fine saying yeah get in there and regulate this stuff except that regulation or lack there of isn't really the culprit here, its bad law enforcement and bad pet stewardship. The pet owner is dead so one loose end is tied up but what about the sheriff???
Exactly. Laws are only as good as the people who are tasked with enforcing them.
