Miles;1317622; said:
The P. sp. "Tiger" you list in the 4 empty slots.. Is this synonymous with P. Menchacai?
The holotype of P. menchacai is from Santa Fe, Argentina and Rosa wrote:
"The holotype of P. menchacai agrees with P. falkneri in all examined characters (dentition, tail spines, morphometrics and meristics), excepting the yellow spots on the disc, which are relatively larger than in typical specimens of P. falkneri. This condition is interpreted as an intraspecific variation of the color pattern, and P. menchacai is regarded as a synonym of P. falkneri"
The conclusion in the Aqualog, that the tiger ray may be P. menchacai is only based on a pure black and white picture of the holotype in Rosas work. In this picture you can only see a nearly black ray and the disk shape and tail lenght is similar to that of a tiger ray. Btw. this is one of the better pictures in my copy, the former picture that show the paratype of P. falkneri is black in black with only some white dots and lines on it ... no ray visible ... so it is impossible to compare the body shape with the menchacai holotype.
I was under the impression that P40 was the peruvian flower
P40 is imported from Brazil. I think that the P39 and P40 show the same species, P39 is juvenile and P40 adult.
Does anyone have solid information on why this classification is under confusion
Rosa wrote:
"Most of the aerly and recent original descriptions were incomplete, and failed to include enough characters for specific diagnoses. The taxonomic status of several species has remained douptful because their type specimens have been lost." p.3
and
"Several species of potamotrygonids were based on a single, sometimes imperfect specimen, and some have been known only from their poor original description or illustration. The taxonomy of potamotrygonids has reached a complicated and confused state, so that a major revision is necessary." p.39
Each author of a f/w stingray book bring in his own ideas without scientific work and the result is a mess.
So my best answer is:
"There are no answers, only choices"
Rayman, I noticed you referred to P40 as another Scobina 'Belem'.. Is their 4 varieties of the Belem Scobina? I have seen arguments for a number of variants of Scobina.
Patricia did much work on the scobina in Marajo Bay, there are some color variants. But none of them look like the scobinas in our tank or like the P37-P40.
So best would be to label the P37 - P40 as P. sp. "Belem"
And.. P55 P. Cf. Yepezi.. Is this the true yepezi from Marcaibo, Venezuala? or is this the Peruvian Yepezi that is so often mis-labeled?
That is a Peruvian ray, so better is P. sp. "Peru".