The Rusty Crayfish

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
I am having a very hard time understanding your objections to someone keeping Rusty crayfish if they aren't breaking any laws and have no intention of releasing them into the wild.Sure they are invasive but so are a ton of other things which one is permitted to purchase. There are a lot of things in Canada which pose a threat or may pose a threat but aren't banned in most if any provinces. Off the top of my head Fanwort, Milfoil, Asian Clams, Snakeheads (only Ontario and Saskatchewan)), Koi, Weather Loach, Water Chestnut,Red Swamp Crayfish, Yellow Floating Heart ect.. I am no expert on your guys laws in the states, I know more things are banned there then here and the various states have there prohibited/regulated lists but the fact remains there are various plants and creatures for sale which are invasive and do pose a threat to the regions in which they are being sold in.I believe Koi are permitted in most if not all states (possible exception Maine) and they have a fairly nasty reputation as an invasive species.They can do lots of damage, a few years back in New Brunswick I believe they did serious damage to a trout pond or Lake and the government had to poison the whole thing to get rid of them. Maine is concerned enough about them to ban them, other states with similar climates don't.Point is they have invasive tendencies and lots of people keep them and lots of places permit them.I did some reading on things with invasive tendencies on the following websites, though I am not sure how current the info is (possibly some things have changed in regards to whats prohibited) but anyway here they are.

http://www.creativepondsandlandscapes.com/DNRexoticplants.htm
http://dnr.wi.gov/invasives/species.asp?filterBy=Aquatic&filterVal=Y

One notices that various species of an invasive nature are prohibited in some places and permitted in others and it isn't necessarily because they can't survive and pose a threat in the places they are permitted, its solely based on the decision of the state. I notice via your profile that you are from Minnesota. Minnesota did and from what I can see still does allow the sale of both Fanwort and Yellow Floating Heart. Those species are doing some real damage in my country and are highly invasive. Fanwort is choking some lakes in Ontario to death and spreading uncontrollably and right here in my province of Nova Scotia Yellow Floating Heart has invaded and is basically killing Little Albro lake ( I can post some pictures of both situations if you like I am afraid its pretty nasty stuff). I would venture a guess that they would do the same in your state given its similar climate.Seems like its legal to buy/sell/possess them there unless something has changed.. My point is that there are lots of things out there with invasive reputations possessed by a lot of people, so just because something has the reputation doesn't mean its wrong to want to possess them or at the very least there are a lot of people doing the same thing as i am trying to do (own something with an invasive reputation).

It boils down to whats legal by law and what isn't. I am a law abiding citizen and if its illegal to sell them everywhere and illegal to import them then i am perfectly fine with fully dropping the subject ( i am no law breaker).In regards to "other crayfish being available I have tried Australian Blue, Australian Redclaw, Red Swamp and marbled and that is about all the types one can get directly at the pet stores in my province so if I want to try"other types" I have to look a bit further afield. I want to try the Rusty because they are big, very hardy and active. they have an invasive reputation but so do a lot of other things on the market.I am not pro invasive species in the least but at the end of the day its the governments responsibility to prohibit and regulate things not mine. If they are a serious threat then possession and sale should be banned everywhere.My obligations as the owner/buyer are to not purchase or import prohibited species and not to release anything into the wild. It isn't to not buy something which i am legally allowed to have simply because its got invasive tendencies. After all barring any ill prepared ill conceived outdoor setup allowing accidental escape any species in a proper indoor setup is only as invasive as its owner allows it to be.

Let me also say I am no expert on the American laws and I am not personally attacking you. I only have 2 simple questions which I would like to see some proof with. Is it legal/illegal to buy and sell Rusty Crayfish in every part of the states they are found and is it legal/illegal to import them. I just need clarification on these points. If its legal in places then I would like to know where to get them. If its illegal everywheres then I will drop the subject,apologize and try another type. Thanks
 
You will have trouble to find someone to import an invasive crayfish species out of states, it's all COMMON SENSES. But then again I am not too worried as you have slim or no chance to find someone to import rusty crayfish out of United States.
 
The last post said it all. Part of responsible fish keeping is not adding to the problem of invasive species.

Our wildlife department as determined that the rusty crayfish is established, that's the reason I have the potential of keeping it. If it's not established, keep it the hell out.
 
The Tasmanian cray you can definitely forget about... I think i remember reading they were on the endangered list or protected by the state of Tasmania from collection...

But definitely agree one crazy lookin cray...


Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
 
I am not worried in the least ether. No doubt it will be hard but hard and impossible are different things and I still haven't seen any relevant documentation saying that it is illegal to sell and ship in all places it is present or illegal to import.Realistically speaking I may very probably have another option in the not so distant future, I have heard they are still being spread around Maine and showing up in new places there. I doubt it will be much longer before they enter into my neighboring province of New Brunswick which has no Crayfish laws (its already happened in the past with the Spinycheek and Virile). Don't get me wrong I definitely don't want this to happen but it seems increasingly likely. If it does and there are no laws preventing obtaining them from the wild then I would definitely consider that an option. If the "common sense" which is prevalent elsewhere and allows the selling of fanwort, yellow floating Heart and many other things with invasive tendencies is present then i definitely think that it is still worth looking into buying this Crayfish.Its entirely possible I won't be able to obtain it but a person will never know for sure if they don't try. Also since I have wanted to try it for a while I will at least exhaust all me legal/permissible options before looking for something else.

I got no personal issue with you and let us hope this common sense which you talk about keeps your native Minnesota waters safe. My personal opinion though is i am really not too optimistic. Allowing the legal selling of Fanwort and Yellow Floating Heart is a bad idea and an accident waiting to happen. Even if most people are like myself and would never release anything into the wild it only takes that one bad apple or uninformed person to do this and you have a real mess on your hand.Honestly i just don't understand how states so concerned about stopping the spread of the Rusty can ignore things which pose as big of problem. Can we really call this common sense? I just think sooner or later if you continue to allow the selling of these plants they will absolutely find there way into the wild ether accidentally or intentionally. Then you will have lakes being suffocated by these invaders, people can say it will never happen but thats what people here thought.

To the poster who says part of responsible fish keeping isn't adding to the problem I say I have no intention of adding to the problem. My opinion is that following the laws constitutes responsible fish keeping. If the Rusty is banned everywhere then so be it I am more then happy to follow the laws. Fact is from what i can see they definitely aren't banned here and it is still an open question unless i see some documented proof that they are banned for sale or import everywhere in the states. If there is a place that will ship them legally and I obtain them i am doing nothing wrong or irresponsible. let us not confuse a moral sense of irresponsibility with actual irresponsibility. Thinking it is wrong to want to have something just because its got an invasive reputation isn't a good reason at all in my book, there are millions of people who keep things with potentially invasive tendencies (see my examples from before). We as fish keepers need only follow the laws on whats legal and what isn't and the laws against releasing things.If something is really nasty then the government should ban it and enforce the ban. Its as simple as that. Most people are quite willing to do there part by not buying the things as long as the government does there part by making the rules.
 
Here's the advice for you: Try other crayfish species and that is my last advice for you and save your lecture. It's all common senses and you will find out that nobody wants to import an invasive species out of United States. Isn't that hard to find out?
 
I took your advice into consideration but I am going to keep looking. Like I said you could well be right but I haven't seen enough evidence to back it up that they are impossible to obtain. They are definitely illegal in places but in regards to importation and the entire range that remains to be seen. One can say that no one will ship a potentially invasive species outside the USA due to common sense but I need to see some hard evidence to back this up. As with all due respect can ether of us speak for people everywhere in the states or every wheres beyond our current locations. I personally need to have a look around at the various rules and regulations of the places they are found and contact some aquarium suppliers in these areas not to mention check out some other forums. I will also contact my friend who is a member of our local aquarium club and has been a fish importer for years. He can get pretty much anything from sterlet to most any type of snakehead to Mahseers to Wels catfish so if anyone would know whether its truly impossible/illegal its him. I have looked at some lists for regulated and nuisance species for this country and I have been unable to find this crayfish on them thus far.I won't get back into the lecture, all i am going to do is reiterate a couple of previous points involving the selling and transport of potential invasives as commonplace in both our countries and also the point that Canada allows the import in many places of one of the worlds most feared invasive species the Northern Snakehead this likewise leads me to believe that importing the Crayfish definitely might not be impossible on our end anyway.


With that said i had a question for you regarding state crayfish laws (given your knowledge of Wisconsin) and would also like yours or anyone else opinion. In doing some research I have heard that Nebraska has pretty much no crayfish laws and Rustys aren't even considered really invasive there yet anyway. In fact they are commonly sold (especially as bait), I was wondering if thisn is true. I also found this site and it seems to indicate a decent number of states have no relevant laws regarding Crayfish (or at least none that could be found). So I can't help but wonder if some of these states might be willing to ship them.

http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=Ne...28&mkt=en-CA&setlang=en-CA&w=a35e59b,2838cd58
 
I am not going to read all your lectures so my best advice is trying out other species, instead of get in trouble with state laws/federal laws by import an invasive crayfish.
 
that wasn't a lecture at it was an explanation and a question. I would like to ask the question one more time since you bring up state and federal laws. My question is "In doing some research I have heard that Nebraska has pretty much no crayfish laws and Rustys aren't even considered really invasive there yet anyway. In fact they are commonly sold (especially as bait), I was wondering if this is true. I also found this site and it seems to indicate a decent number of states have no relevant laws regarding Crayfish (or at least none that could be found). So I can't help but wonder if some of these states might be willing to ship them"

http://cc.bingj.com/cache.aspx?q=Neb...5e59b,2838cd58


Surely it is no trouble for you to answer this since you are certain no place will ship them.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com