Thoughts on Fancy Goldfish

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
This thread is flying by. The places by me that sell koi usually have nice comets and stuff, but not really any quality fancy golds.They also don't carry any of the super nice koi you can find online.

Ah, Socal has me spoiled that way. There are a few places no more than 20 minutes away from me. I would guess they ship. I remember Eastern Nishikigoi (sp?) had a really good selection of fancy goldfish. Andrews Koi I think had some, also Asahi Koi.Asahi is in LA county, the other two are in Orange County. I remember someone (glennsomething) recommending a place here recently, I don't remember the place, only remember to ask for Cynthia, sorry. Keep searching online :)
 
Think the thread is moving too fast to see your logic...but i do :)


This one is worse than the tropical vs native
Sent from my SM-G900P using MonsterAquariaNetwork App

Id say they're pretty equal in ridiculousness. You and I both went on rants of posting pictures of the prized fish from each of our favorite fish :D.

But this thread is getting to hard to follow if I put the phone down for more than two minutes :popcorn:
 
Think the thread is moving too fast to see your logic...but i do :)


This one is worse than the tropical vs native
Sent from my SM-G900P using MonsterAquariaNetwork App

I completely agree with you. Noticed both threads have same posters in them.
 
Re the fat discussion: Goldfish are bred to be "fat" in one sense (in the shape of their body, in how they are built), but that is not the same thing as them being "fat" in the obese, unhealthy sense. Look at Greyhounds compared to bulldogs. They are just built differently. If a greyhound was as big around as a typical (not obese) bulldog, it would indeed be fat (in the obese sense). And bulldogs can be obese, but if one were as thin as a greyhound there would be something wrong, because they were not bred to look like that.

So yes, fancy goldfish are bred to be "fat" in a sense, but that does not mean they are naturally obese or unhealthy. If they are well maintained there is nothing wrong with that kind of healthy "fatness" anymore than it is wrong for a bulldog to be "fatter" than a greyhound.
 
No way! Lol you trolled that thread so hard


Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app

And the pot calls the kettle black lol

Id say they're pretty equal in ridiculousness. You and I both went on rants of posting pictures of the prized fish from each of our favorite fish :D.

But this thread is getting to hard to follow if I put the phone down for more than two minutes :popcorn:

I cant wven keep track, yeah we did go at it pretty good....had fun though


I completely agree with you. Noticed both threads have same posters in them.

Yup all the trouble makers

Sent from my SM-G900P using MonsterAquariaNetwork App
 
,
Re the fat discussion: Goldfish are bred to be "fat" in one sense (in the shape of their body, in how they are built), but that is not the same thing as them being "fat" in the obese, unhealthy sense. Look at Greyhounds compared to bulldogs. They are just built differently. If a greyhound was as big around as a typical (not obese) bulldog, it would indeed be fat (in the obese sense). And bulldogs can be obese, but if one were as thin as a greyhound there would be something wrong, because they were not bred to look like that.

So yes, fancy goldfish are bred to be "fat" in a sense, but that does not mean they are naturally obese or unhealthy. If they are well maintained there is nothing wrong with that kind of healthy "fatness" anymore than it is wrong for a bulldog to be "fatter" than a greyhound.

Your making way way way too much sense. :)
 
This sounds like brainwashing Redear, I call a conspiracy theory! You working for the goldfish companies? Lol :D

No way, I tell you I have never ever been happier in my fish keeping since I switched to 100 percent goldfish. And I've kept everything from salt to rockbass.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com