methos75;4585775; said:Well we both know that I am going strictly off what is stated in research about Captive Matamata's and what they seem to respond better to in captivity, every turtle is going to have be a bit different and success in the past doesn't mean that is going to work for the whole. I mean I keep a AST in a deep Water tank which is a big no no too many and he gets along great in it, but that is just him, I know other keepers who have had AST's drown in half the water depth I use. There are no hard and fast rules here, just commonality such as with the Matamata in which most experts like Gurley find are better kept in shallow water
The fact of the matter remains......They are deep water Turtles......All you have to do is look at the feet at that will tell you everything......Strong webbed feet for moving in fast current, and long claws to anchor in soft substrate.......They might not be "swimmers" like a Podoc or something similiar, but they're built to be streamlined in deep, fast moving water.......
The whole shallow water debate basically boils down to making things easy on the keeper, but mis-information is mis-information.......The only Person breeding Matas consistantly is doing it in deep Ponds......That's all there is to it......If I followed in what the "Experts" say about Matas, according to them, I'd have a really awesome shell collection......But I don't. That's not being arrogant, that's just the reality of things......You can keep a Mata in an inch of water and it will eat, breathe, and poop......Some define that as success........However, my definition of success is eating, breathing, pooping, courtship, nesting, and eventual hatchlings.......That throws a different dynamic and thinking into the equation.....
Just my thoughts on it.......