UPDATE: ortanum, festae, tetracanthus, zonatus

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
freebyrd;4940968; said:
I will say this. Your paratheraps you have there are beautiful. The zonatus I had was 3-4" and was also supposedly from Rio Carolina. Yours blow mine away, you may have something else.

Some of the lesser dominent fish/femles are not nearly as bright as the two larger males. That and the lighting in this tank is really in their favor. My camera sucks so I take a different route on tank lighting than most others do.
 
JK47;4941390; said:
Some of the lesser dominent fish/femles are not nearly as bright as the two larger males. That and the lighting in this tank is really in their favor. My camera sucks so I take a different route on tank lighting than most others do.

Have you explained this route in another thread? My camera sucks, too... :irked:
 
Dan Feller;4941394; said:
Have you explained this route in another thread? My camera sucks, too... :irked:

Allot of people go the more light is better approach but all my fish are much more confident if there are shaded areas in the tank. So I use a 36" T5HO in the center to provide a very bright area in the center (similar o using a speedlight) where the other areas are dark. It's an 8' 300 gallon. I would load a FTS but I can't. There are pics in my albums I believe of early on when I set up the tank.. They are not up to date but you get the idea.
 
Darth pike is quite right about 'Heros', but my understanding is that Heros is still pending for a more definitive classification to establish a new genus. This will hopefully include a few species such as beani and salvini. However, exCichlasoma is still quite exceptable for now.;)

I would like to give an opinion on your Rio Carolino fish. In my opinion that fish dosen't resemble sp. coatzacoalcos Rio Carolino, infact it dosen't resemble any population of sp. coatzacoalcos, therefore i would question the infomation of your lfs. Someone has something mixed up somewhere.

As far as the systematics of sp. coatzacoalcos, it is still classesd as undescribed. Its kind of frustrating as this fish has been in the hobby for almost 28 years. These were once thought to be a variation of zonatus, but many experts believe that there are enough traits to seperate and classify them as 2 seperate species.

This what i know and certainly not conclusive, but many experts appear to avoid the questions regarding seperation. If we look at distribution. Sp coatzacoalcos are found in the upper parts of the coatzacoalcos basin in the province of Oaxaca, Atlantic side. This includes populations from Rio Jaltepec, Rio Junapan, Rio grande, Rio ajal, Rio Almoloya. True zonatus populations are reported to be on the Pacific side, Rio Zanatipec, Rio Niltepec and Rio Tehuantepec. I have talked to many hobbyist who have collected wild zonatus populations and they say it's all in the tail. The germans knicknamed them "Rotschwanztheraps" (Red tailed theraps).

If we compare the type locality zonatus (Niltepec, southern Oaxaca) then to me there are some key differences. The type locality zonatus has almost completely red caudal and a lot of red on the end base of the dorsal fin. I've also noted that the pectoral fins have a red hue. These traits are more apparent in younger fish as older fish loose these colours and will display a red band on the caudal fin. This extensive red colouring is displayed on Mo's earlier photos of he's zonatus and also to some extent on the fish described on the thread. Sp. coatzacoalcos display more yellow colouration on the caudal fin. The black lateral stripe is consistant on both species, but zonatus appear to display black markings on the upper body, while sp. coatzacoalcos display black on the lower part. Sp. coatzacoalcos sometimes display a red band across the upper part of the mouth, but this is not always a trait as the Rio Grande population lack this and are almost completely blue. This is why the species interest me, there is so much variation between populations. Sp. coatzacoalcos display a bright yellow colouration when spawning, especially with pairs observed in the wild. This i believe dosen't happen with zonatus.

If anyone has a copy of Aqualog book 3, there's a good idea of what the type locality zonatus looks like. These are my own personal observations and are certainly not conclusive, but until the systematics of the fish have been officially worked on and presented, we will still be debating if the fish are the same species. I hope the fish will be officially described in the near future. ;)

Sorry for the long explanation, as i noticed on this forum a lot of people get the names and identification wrong. I see many people who claim to keep zonatus are infact sp. coatzacoalcos. I would even question Don Conkels zonatus, especially the Rio Nachintal population thats mainly offered, i have no idea what the Rio Jaltepec population look like. so i hope this may have answered a few questions.

Regards,

Lee Nuttall.
 
nutty;4941513; said:
Darth pike is quite right about 'Heros', but my understanding is that Heros is still pending for a more definitive classification to establish a new genus. This will hopefully include a few species such as beani and salvini. However, exCichlasoma is still quite exceptable for now.;)

I would like to give an opinion on your Rio Carolino fish. In my opinion that fish dosen't resemble sp. coatzacoalcos Rio Carolino, infact it dosen't resemble any population of sp. coatzacoalcos, therefore i would question the infomation of your lfs. Someone has something mixed up somewhere.

As far a the systematics of sp. coatzacoalcos, it is still classesd as undescribed. Its kind of frustrating as this fish has been in the hobby for almost 28 years. These were once thought to be a variation of zonatus, but many experts believe that there are enough traits to seperate and classify them as 2 seperate species.

This what i know and certainly not conclusive, but many experts appear to avoid the questions regarding seperation. If we look at distribution. Sp coatzacoalcos are found in the upper parts of the coatzacoalcos basin in the province of Oaxaca, Atlantic side. This includes populations from Rio Jaltepec, Rio Junapan, Rio grande, Rio ajal, Rio Almoloya. True zonatus populations are reported to be on the Pacific side, Rio Zanatipec, Rio Niltepec and Rio Tehuantepec. I have talked to many hobbyist who have collected wild zonatus populations and they say it's all in the tail. The germans knicknamed them "Rotschwanztheraps" (Red tailed theraps).

If we compare the type locality zonatus (Niltepec, southern Oaxaca) then to me there are some key differences. The type locality zonatus has almost completely red caudal and a lot of red on the end base of the dorsal fin. I've also noted that the pectoral fins have a red hue. These traits are more apparent in younger fish as older fish loose these colours and will display a red band on the caudal fin. This extensive red colouring is displayed on Mo's earlier photos of he's zonatus and also to some extent on the fish described on the thread. Sp. coatzacoalcos display more yellow colouration on the caudal fin. The black lateral stripe is consistant on both species, but zonatus appear to display black markings on the upper body, while sp. coatzacoalcos display black on the lower part. Sp. coatzacoalcos sometimes display a red band across the upper part of the mouth, but this is not always a trait as the Rio Grande population lack this and are almost completely blue. This is why the species interest me, there is so much variation between populations. Sp. coatzacoalcos display a bright yellow colouration when spawning, especially with pairs observed in the wild. This i believe dosen't happen with zonatus.

If anyone has a copy of Aqualog book 3, there's a good idea of what the type locality zonatus looks like. These are my own personal observations and are certainly not conclusive, but until the systematics of the fish have been officially worked on and presented, we will still be debating if the fish are the same species. I hope the fish will be officially described in the near future. ;)

Sorry for the long explanation, as i noticed on this forum a lot of people get the names and identification wrong. I see many people who claim to keep zonatus are infact sp. coatzacoalcos. I would even question Don Conkels zonatus, especially the Rio Nachintal population thats mainly offered, i have no idea what the Rio Jaltepec population look like. so i hope this may have answered a few questions.

Regards,

Lee Nuttall.

That was a very informative and good read Lee, for taking the time to write that out I really appreciate it. That gives me some good info to start doing some additional homework. I've been lurking your threads on CRC as well and have learned a lot from those too, so keep the quality info coming. I am glad there are more experienced members that agree with me on the ID. In all honesty all the confusion and locale veriants is what attracted me to this species to begin with so I could not lose no matter what I came home with. It took a while to get them as it is.. ;)
 
Looking good bro. I'm looking forward to seeing them grow out.
 
nutty;4941513; said:
Darth pike is quite right about 'Heros', but my understanding is that Heros is still pending for a more definitive classification to establish a new genus. This will hopefully include a few species such as beani and salvini. However, exCichlasoma is still quite exceptable for now.;)

I would like to give an opinion on your Rio Carolino fish. In my opinion that fish dosen't resemble sp. coatzacoalcos Rio Carolino, infact it dosen't resemble any population of sp. coatzacoalcos, therefore i would question the infomation of your lfs. Someone has something mixed up somewhere.

As far as the systematics of sp. coatzacoalcos, it is still classesd as undescribed. Its kind of frustrating as this fish has been in the hobby for almost 28 years. These were once thought to be a variation of zonatus, but many experts believe that there are enough traits to seperate and classify them as 2 seperate species.

This what i know and certainly not conclusive, but many experts appear to avoid the questions regarding seperation. If we look at distribution. Sp coatzacoalcos are found in the upper parts of the coatzacoalcos basin in the province of Oaxaca, Atlantic side. This includes populations from Rio Jaltepec, Rio Junapan, Rio grande, Rio ajal, Rio Almoloya. True zonatus populations are reported to be on the Pacific side, Rio Zanatipec, Rio Niltepec and Rio Tehuantepec. I have talked to many hobbyist who have collected wild zonatus populations and they say it's all in the tail. The germans knicknamed them "Rotschwanztheraps" (Red tailed theraps).

If we compare the type locality zonatus (Niltepec, southern Oaxaca) then to me there are some key differences. The type locality zonatus has almost completely red caudal and a lot of red on the end base of the dorsal fin. I've also noted that the pectoral fins have a red hue. These traits are more apparent in younger fish as older fish loose these colours and will display a red band on the caudal fin. This extensive red colouring is displayed on Mo's earlier photos of he's zonatus and also to some extent on the fish described on the thread. Sp. coatzacoalcos display more yellow colouration on the caudal fin. The black lateral stripe is consistant on both species, but zonatus appear to display black markings on the upper body, while sp. coatzacoalcos display black on the lower part. Sp. coatzacoalcos sometimes display a red band across the upper part of the mouth, but this is not always a trait as the Rio Grande population lack this and are almost completely blue. This is why the species interest me, there is so much variation between populations. Sp. coatzacoalcos display a bright yellow colouration when spawning, especially with pairs observed in the wild. This i believe dosen't happen with zonatus.

If anyone has a copy of Aqualog book 3, there's a good idea of what the type locality zonatus looks like. These are my own personal observations and are certainly not conclusive, but until the systematics of the fish have been officially worked on and presented, we will still be debating if the fish are the same species. I hope the fish will be officially described in the near future. ;)

Sorry for the long explanation, as i noticed on this forum a lot of people get the names and identification wrong. I see many people who claim to keep zonatus are infact sp. coatzacoalcos. I would even question Don Conkels zonatus, especially the Rio Nachintal population thats mainly offered, i have no idea what the Rio Jaltepec population look like. so i hope this may have answered a few questions.

Regards,

Lee Nuttall.

Very, very interesting. Thank you very much for the information.

Oaxaca is a very cool place, I traveled there quite extensively between 1988 and 2004. I spent some time in Tehuatepec and passed through Niltepec back in 1992. If only it wasn't so difficult to get a collecting permit in Mexico these days...
 
Yo justin if you get your festae pair and want to sell some of the other fry send me a Pm Ill drive down.
 
Nemesis;4942369; said:
Looking good bro. I'm looking forward to seeing them grow out.

Thanks David! We need some updated pics of your stock bro! Haven't seen any in a while ;)

Maccoy;4942768; said:
Yo justin if you get your festae pair and want to sell some of the other fry send me a Pm Ill drive down.

You got it Mac. I am about 5 minutes north of the Columbia on the WA side. Your more than welcome to pop over and check out my tanks if your ever in the area. Jeff and James are first in line at them after I get my piar but I should have plenty.
 
You got it Mac. I am about 5 minutes north of the Columbia on the WA side. Your more than welcome to pop over and check out my tanks if your ever in the area. Jeff and James are first in line at them after I get my pair but I should have plenty.[/QUOTE]


Thanks man I for sure wanna come see them some time.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com