First and foremost, my condolences to all who have lost fish in recent weeks. It seems as if we have had a spate of "dead fish" posts lately.
Secondly, this post is not meant to offend anyone so please don't be if I make reference to a fish that you may think is yours. This post is to start a dialouge and shed light on what's best to feed our awesome pets.
OK, now with that out of the way, I'm wondering if non-live foods are the best for a truely vivacious, healthy and vibrant Cichla? I understand the reasoning for weaning Cichla off of live food. Cost and prevention of disease. Great. Makes sense. But with that said, it seems like most of the young Cichla that have been lost in recent weeks were being fed non-live foods or at least an attempt was being made to wean them off of live foods.
I can understand the attraction... trust me. Having to always run to the store for feeders is both time consuming and expensive. The problem is that the fish which are pictured as eating shrimp or pellets always seem skinny and almost emaciated whenever pictures are posted. I've noticed this with a lot of the Cichla posted here that are on non-live foods, especially younger specimens. There was a recent pic of a young Cichla that is now on shrimp. The fish has a exceptionally large head, small body and very concave stomach. It has been my expereince that this is a malnourished fish. Are they truely getting what they need from the shrimp? My guess would be no. Just because they eat alot doesn't mean they are well nourished.
There are exceptions such as Joey's fish which look fantastic but I'm willing to bet he feeds them a butt load to keep them that fat and sassy. With that said, even Joey has mentioned how fish which he has given live feeders outgrow and outshine those that he feeds preparred foods to. To me this is a strong indication that the live feeders are a preferable diet.
Ideally, getting these fish on a combination of live foods and preparred foods would be best but the Cichla seem to wait for the feeders and ignore all other foods. It's an all or nothing type thing with them.
I'm interested in hearing what others think or have experienced regarding this subject. At the very least perhaps our young Cichla should be fed live feeders exclusively and then weaned onto preparred foods after they have matured somewhat. The larger, older fish are infinitely more capable of dealing with the lack of food that is oft times required to get them off of live.
Secondly, this post is not meant to offend anyone so please don't be if I make reference to a fish that you may think is yours. This post is to start a dialouge and shed light on what's best to feed our awesome pets.
OK, now with that out of the way, I'm wondering if non-live foods are the best for a truely vivacious, healthy and vibrant Cichla? I understand the reasoning for weaning Cichla off of live food. Cost and prevention of disease. Great. Makes sense. But with that said, it seems like most of the young Cichla that have been lost in recent weeks were being fed non-live foods or at least an attempt was being made to wean them off of live foods.
I can understand the attraction... trust me. Having to always run to the store for feeders is both time consuming and expensive. The problem is that the fish which are pictured as eating shrimp or pellets always seem skinny and almost emaciated whenever pictures are posted. I've noticed this with a lot of the Cichla posted here that are on non-live foods, especially younger specimens. There was a recent pic of a young Cichla that is now on shrimp. The fish has a exceptionally large head, small body and very concave stomach. It has been my expereince that this is a malnourished fish. Are they truely getting what they need from the shrimp? My guess would be no. Just because they eat alot doesn't mean they are well nourished.
There are exceptions such as Joey's fish which look fantastic but I'm willing to bet he feeds them a butt load to keep them that fat and sassy. With that said, even Joey has mentioned how fish which he has given live feeders outgrow and outshine those that he feeds preparred foods to. To me this is a strong indication that the live feeders are a preferable diet.
Ideally, getting these fish on a combination of live foods and preparred foods would be best but the Cichla seem to wait for the feeders and ignore all other foods. It's an all or nothing type thing with them.
I'm interested in hearing what others think or have experienced regarding this subject. At the very least perhaps our young Cichla should be fed live feeders exclusively and then weaned onto preparred foods after they have matured somewhat. The larger, older fish are infinitely more capable of dealing with the lack of food that is oft times required to get them off of live.