I think that the different species of fish that have been fed to our fish, have also spoken volumes as far as growth goes..
I have fed many Live Minnows... And Dead minnows... The nutritional value is of course different in a Minnow vs. A goldfish.. Especially when it comes to fat.
I think Without actually doing the experiment you suggest. that there is not a concrete and persuading arguement to contradict your opinion or arguement
So I think you are correct that until a valid; single species fish, live and dead comparison experiment is completed. Then there is No; concrete, factual knowledge of the opinions I have voiced.
I have worked with Minnows..(Chub) last year.. But I really wasn't paying enough attention to gauge the growth rate differences..
I know that there were some smaller and some definately larger. But when you are working with Many at the same time.. You definitely have a few runts...
Spring is comin, and minnows are going to be easier.. Maybe I will run a month or two experiment if no one does first..
Oh and I don't know why I didn't think to do that.. I guess at that point; and still until you just pointed it out, that I really wasn't into that depth of concern on the issue
Now I am, and it will be interesting when we come out with some findings..
Thanks for clarifying
My beliefs on being offended have no grounds 
And the reason I took the offended side was because the topic is not Live vs dead fish.. it is Validity of Non live/Prepared foods. So My bad
I was going on the Non live prepared in only a few areas namely
Smelt full (head on)
Market Srhimp
Krill
Pellets (NLS/AZOO/Hikari cichlid)
Etc... foods I have used.
Vs.
any and all Live fish I have fed.
The results were conclusive as far as that went.So I thought that was good enough til an hour ago. Mainly due to the fact that the porteins; and other nutritional knowns, of these foods were higher than most of the live fish that are being fed today.
I mean.. Krill for instance has an extremely high Protein content and is accepted as quote: High in nutrition.
Yet live goldfish give higher growth rates with less feeding.
My current speculation is that there is something mentally affecting growth when it comes to live fish vs other foods.
Now my current conclusions aside from single specie experimentation, is similar..
Though Technically we cannot call my (experiments ... experiments.) Though I feel they are valid and do prove within reason, that Prepared foods (examples above) just don't give the same bang for the buck that live fish does.
I will document the next more extensibvely than the previous ones
Which really isn't saying much
Thanks again for clearing up my confusion
I have fed many Live Minnows... And Dead minnows... The nutritional value is of course different in a Minnow vs. A goldfish.. Especially when it comes to fat.
I think Without actually doing the experiment you suggest. that there is not a concrete and persuading arguement to contradict your opinion or arguement

So I think you are correct that until a valid; single species fish, live and dead comparison experiment is completed. Then there is No; concrete, factual knowledge of the opinions I have voiced.
I have worked with Minnows..(Chub) last year.. But I really wasn't paying enough attention to gauge the growth rate differences..
I know that there were some smaller and some definately larger. But when you are working with Many at the same time.. You definitely have a few runts...
Spring is comin, and minnows are going to be easier.. Maybe I will run a month or two experiment if no one does first..
Oh and I don't know why I didn't think to do that.. I guess at that point; and still until you just pointed it out, that I really wasn't into that depth of concern on the issue


Now I am, and it will be interesting when we come out with some findings..
Thanks for clarifying


And the reason I took the offended side was because the topic is not Live vs dead fish.. it is Validity of Non live/Prepared foods. So My bad

I was going on the Non live prepared in only a few areas namely
Smelt full (head on)
Market Srhimp
Krill
Pellets (NLS/AZOO/Hikari cichlid)
Etc... foods I have used.
Vs.
any and all Live fish I have fed.
The results were conclusive as far as that went.So I thought that was good enough til an hour ago. Mainly due to the fact that the porteins; and other nutritional knowns, of these foods were higher than most of the live fish that are being fed today.
I mean.. Krill for instance has an extremely high Protein content and is accepted as quote: High in nutrition.
Yet live goldfish give higher growth rates with less feeding.
My current speculation is that there is something mentally affecting growth when it comes to live fish vs other foods.
Now my current conclusions aside from single specie experimentation, is similar..
Though Technically we cannot call my (experiments ... experiments.) Though I feel they are valid and do prove within reason, that Prepared foods (examples above) just don't give the same bang for the buck that live fish does.
I will document the next more extensibvely than the previous ones

Which really isn't saying much

Thanks again for clearing up my confusion
