trashcan;2665160; said:Ontario Superior Court, in Canada. But I'm sure there are plenty of radical judges who would rule the same way in the US.
woops. pays not to skim a post.

trashcan;2665160; said:Ontario Superior Court, in Canada. But I'm sure there are plenty of radical judges who would rule the same way in the US.

arkmann;2665096; said:Ouch!!!
I especially don't get this statement:
"The right to child support is the right of a child, and is independent of a parent's own conduct."
The man is being forced by the court to make payments eventhough the kids are not his?
The standard criteria in Canada for a non-biological parent is that if you go through 5 years of being in a parental role to a child, you could be legally bound to pay child support. The parent is not required to adopt the child or even marry the other parent.
imcrystal;2665771; said:i think the non- biological dad should still pay child support and be a father to those kids, but i dont think that should be for the judge to decide. if he wants to pay then he shouldnt be court ordered, he can do it out of his own free will. he shouldnt just cut them off after 16 years bc they dont share the same dna.
and his stupid wife said she doesnt even remember having an affiar hahaha yeah right