what are these classifications F0, F1, etc

[Druu]

f1.25....if your lucky atleast

At best, f1.5 - the offspring f-number is one integer higher than that of the parents. Where the parents are of the same f-number, there is no problem. Where parents are of different f-numbers, you can either average the numbers or assign a decimal point number. The problem arises when you breed a f4 to a f0. Averaging would give you f2 before you added the integer. It's illogical to have a f3 offspring from a f0xf3. The alternative would be to add the decimal and end up with a f4.5, which also makes little sense.

 

[monty_javier]

Actually I was going more in the joke direction. I guess it was a stretch, givin the lack of though put in. But it's whatever.

 

[titansfever83]

Thanks Druu. The F0.5 was just me being silly.

I won't even label them as "F" anything when they are ready to be sold. But if a customer asks I will tell them about my breeding pair.

 

[Druu]

Thanks Druu. The F0.5 was just me being silly.

I won't even label them as "F" anything when they are ready to be sold. But if a customer asks I will tell them about my breeding pair.

That's a good plan. I think Rapps or another cichlid seller started using the f[].5 numbers recently. That would just lead to a lot of confusion.

 

[Lupin]

Threads merged as they make good reference files.