Note I specifically didn't say F0. I said Parental generation.
There is no such thing as "F0" in filial generations.

Modest_Man;1675169; said:Ummmm....
If you did a Punnet square of F0 X F1 you'd end up with FF, F1, 0F, and 01. What would that mean?
Tongue33;1674808; said:I think this is better than trying to find away to get f1's out of a WC and An F0 or F1 '
Better to be right in calling them WCx F1 vs wrong in the above opinions. Just my opinion
http://www.malawicichlidhomepage.com/aquainfo/mendelian.html
Quote:
Originally Posted by from abvope link
F generation numbers are to be used cautiously, since misunderstandings may occur. In cases of back cross or out crossing, these numbers are not valid anymore. In general when the fish bred do not belong to the same bloodline or F generation it is better to indicate the two F generations of that particular breeding. For example, if you cross an F2 generation male with an F1 generation female of the same bloodline, it is better to label the fry as F2 x F1. If you cross an F1 parent of one bloodline to an F1 parent from another bloodline, then the fry should be labeled as F1 x F1 and not F2. If you outcross an F1 parent with a wild caught specimen, you should use the F1 x F0 label.