what would you buy

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo

rottbo

Fire Eel
MFK Member
Dec 15, 2005
4,163
9
68
46
West Des Moines, Ia
I am buying a new vehicle and i cant decide what to get i really want to buy a new Jeep Rubicon but i have a kid on the way and dont think that this would be practical i have also looked at the new Land Rover LR3 (my girls choice) but i want something i can build up a little more and have some real fun what would you buy??? any suggestions i havent really looked at other options so suggest away must be four wheel drive no pussy 4x4s either
 
get a rubicon. Tough as nails. My buddy that has one has 2 kids and they enjoy it as much as he does. He never seemed to have a problem with it being impractical. The only bad thing is that the gearing does kill gas mileage a little but they are go anywhere/do anything vehicles.
VERY good choice.....not to mention the 4.0 is one of the best engines ever made IMO
 
When talking serious 4X4, you can't beat the Jeeps. Don't get a Liberty or anything with a V-type engine. The inline sixes are where it's at. If you want to save some gas (and money), the 4 bangers will do anything you need them to do. If you are buying new, GET LIMITED SLIP. I can't stress this enough. My mother ordered her 92 cherokee with 2 open diffs (4.0L, 4 spd automatic, 3.23ish gears), and if you are going over anything other than dirt, you'll slip. Sand, mud, rocks, deep snow all bog it down and make it jump sideways.


I work as a valet, so I can give you the lowdown on pretty much any SUV that you'd like to buy. I'll tell you that the Land Rovers have the worst turning radius of any vehicle I've ever driven. I mean, it's so bad that it's actually noticeable compared even to fullsize Suburbans and Yukons.

My pics, if I were to get a new SUV:

small:
Jeep Wrangler (4.0L)
Honda CR-V

Medium:
Chevy Trailblazer
Ford Explorer (meh, it's OK)

Large:
Suburbans, escalades, yukons, etc (they're all essentially the same)
Infiniti QX-4


The biggest problem with jeeps nowadays is that you can't buy the 4.0L with a manual transmission anymore...at least it's not offered as an option, you might be able to special order it. If you want row-your-own, go with the 4 cyl. Like I said, plenty of power. Since it's going to be a kid hauler though, I'd highly reccomend getting both a hard top and an automatic, so you have just one less thing to deal with. Also, loading baby seats into and out of the back of a wrangler gets kinda hard - a 4 door vehicle might be best. If you're going that direction, you should go GM. Personally, I loathe GM cars. I think that they are the worst made POS machines I've ever seen, driven, owned or ridden in (and I've owned a few), but their SUV's and trucks are second to none. Well, second to Ford, but at this point, it's pretty much tied neck and neck.

The reason I listed the CR-V is that it offers more creature comforts than the Wrangler (good for kids), drives kinda like a wrangler and offers 4WD, and it has 4 doors. However, for simple fun factor, you can't beat a Jeep. Period.


And just so you know that i know what I'm talking about, I've been around Jeeps my entire life- I was brought home from the hospital in an 83 CJ-7 that my father still has (and I'm collecting parts for a restoration soon), My dad's driven Jeeps since 1970, my mom's had Jeeps since 1985, and out of the 7 cars that my family now has, 3 are Jeeps, 2 are trucks and 2 are cars, all of different makes and models, from different years. As a valet, I drive everything from $300,000 maseratis to overheating rusted out 92 Berettas (yeah, it's true).
 
rubicons come with 5 speed and the 4.0. Forget limited slip. they have ARB air lockers front AND rear.
 
mickey85 said:
The reason I listed the CR-V is that it offers more creature comforts than the Wrangler (good for kids), drives kinda like a wrangler and offers 4WD, and it has 4 doors. However, for simple fun factor, you can't beat a Jeep. Period.

:thumbsup:
I have had my CR-V for 4 years now and still love it. I haven't had to do any repairs on it at all, just the normal maintnence. And it is up to 135,000 miles now. They aren't made all terrain, but they are good in everything else. I have taken my out during snow storms and had it mudding a couple of time and it has barely been stopped. Even when the snow was well over my bumpers in places. You can't beat the reliability off a Honda. Plus, the interior room and ground clearance is bigger than some of the larger SUV's. It's well worth the money.
 
JD_MAN said:
:thumbsup:
I have had my CR-V for 4 years now and still love it. I haven't had to do any repairs on it at all, just the normal maintnence. And it is up to 135,000 miles now. They aren't made all terrain, but they are good in everything else. I have taken my out during snow storms and had it mudding a couple of time and it has barely been stopped. Even when the snow was well over my bumpers in places. You can't beat the reliability off a Honda. Plus, the interior room and ground clearance is bigger than some of the larger SUV's. It's well worth the money.


For an all around SUV CRVs kick ass. for reliability and practicality honda is the way to go.
If you want to go off road get a jeep:)
 
you know that rubicons can come with a six speed this is what i was looking at and my woman is worried about getting carseats in and out of the back and i want something that already has the capability not that needs stuff added on this is why i was looking at the lr3 and the rubicon if i could afford a G-wagon i would get one but i cant afford 100g for a car
 
obviously, if you are looking at LR3, besides off road capability, you do care a little about luxury. My wife and I went through this back in August. We looked at the outgoing Discoveries, LR3, Nissan Pathfinder... and everything else. But those 3 were the ones we narrowed it down to. Ended up buying a fully fully loaded Pathfinder. Feature for feature, it was on par with the LR3, a little cheaper, my wife liked the looks better and I was really worried about the reliability of the LR3 (electronics and the suspension seem to be nagging trouble spots for some LR3 owners).

My wife totalled the pathfinder after about 3 months (she was fine) but in the time we had had, we LOVED it, no regrets. Liked the looks and performance, quality, etc. I know, its not going to be as off-road capable as the Land Rover or some of the jeeps, but still a respectable performer for mild-offroading... not a car based SUV like some of the others. It is truck based. ANd its better looking and better quality (IMO... don't flame me for expressing my opinion... I have owned jeeps) than a jeep, and probably would be more relaiable than an LR3, though it IS a notch down in the luxury category, definitely.

Just one for you to think about... Nissan Pathfinder. Of course, I still like an LR3. If you want something to build up, what about the last model year LR Discovery? THe handle like hell on-road, but nice trucks with true offroad capability, luxury, style and a gazillion things you can do to modify them!!
 
JD_MAN said:
:thumbsup:
I have had my CR-V for 4 years now and still love it. I haven't had to do any repairs on it at all, just the normal maintnence. And it is up to 135,000 miles now. They aren't made all terrain, but they are good in everything else. I have taken my out during snow storms and had it mudding a couple of time and it has barely been stopped. Even when the snow was well over my bumpers in places. You can't beat the reliability off a Honda. Plus, the interior room and ground clearance is bigger than some of the larger SUV's. It's well worth the money.
I HATE hondas (i dunno, some personal problem I have, perhaps a bad childhood experience??) but I have to say, I had to sit in the backseat of a CRV for 5 hours last weekend and I was SHOCKED at the fantastic legroom. REALLY GREAT. Kudos to CRV... even though I would never buy one, I now actually respect them!
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com