Stump;2891107; said:I've always pronounced it by-cher....
Geez , another way, lol.
Stump;2891107; said:I've always pronounced it by-cher....
Fish need to have a described catalog number, a latin name, and a common name.
ewurm;834226; said:I think a fishes name must some how describe it. Like Trailerparkus abortionus, a fish that eats it's young. LOL

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMAN BRO!!! I thought about this many-many years ago,you are absolutely 10000000% right,i dont know what to add you said it beautifully.....ewurm;834134; said:After working at a fish store for several months now, I have learned that the discoverers of many fish were not heroes, but total d-bags. Why would you name a species after your self? Isn't it good enough that journals will log you as the discoverer? Many of the African Cichlids are indistinguishable to me because the names do not describe the fish in any way.
Who the hell wants to see Corydoras Wurmeri?
The people who discovered these species were self absorbed d-bags, and I hope that a better system is adopted soon. I propose that both genus and species have to be somewhat reflective of the fishes appearance, origin, or behavior. I further propose that an international standard for common names be made as well. Just like in medicine, there will be a scientific name and a generic name for each fish.