Have you seen Kangaroo mate?impossible for 9 tome animals with two legs. You suggest they did lay on their side, belly on belly. also their tails were stiff and not very flexible.
Have you seen Kangaroo mate?impossible for 9 tome animals with two legs. You suggest they did lay on their side, belly on belly. also their tails were stiff and not very flexible.
Spinosaurus is a theropod. Evry chicken belongs to the same genera.They're not? Then why I don't see one at my local zoo?
no i have not seen any 9 ton kangaroo with a fragile spine on their back mate. Have you seen that?Have you seen Kangaroo mate?
i'm paleogeneticist. that topic here is one of my mains![]()
i won't change my mind back to 50 year old theories which are long dismissed.So were people 30 years ago any science like that is just the best guess, your looking at fossilized bones in trying to figure out how it worked keep studying I'm sure you'll change your mind again
Look it up, and you'll see how it works...no i have not seen any 9 ton kangaroo with a fragile spine on their back mate. Have you seen that?
Look it up, and you'll see how it works...
OP - you have good theories, and your threads would be very good food for thought if you didnt present them in such a confrontational fashion. With any subject, ESPECIALLY nature, you cant assume to know everything. I always say that the key to understanding nature is to treat every experience with it as if it was your first, and as if you know nothing. Act as a student, not a teacher, and you'll learn a lot more, because it has a lot to teach, but it's subtle, and only if you open your mind.
So who knows how they mated?... personally, I'm glad there are still mysteries out there that are yet unsolved. There always will be. Nature is endless.
Bottomfeeder isn't refuting your opinion/point, just how you express it. By the way Bottom I thought that was well said, humble and wise all rolled into one. Also I think most are just saying that the scientific community changes it's theories often and this will probably not be the last theory they come up with regarding Dino's. Again it goes back to what I said "when a scientist says something is impossible they're almost always wrong and when they say something is possible they're almost always right. Meaning never deal in definitives as a theory is just an over glorified way of saying idea.lol!I just showed the actual position of science. Our view on dinosaurs has changed drastical. Just look at cryolophosaurus.
http://fc05.deviantart.net/fs6/i/2005/099/1/7/Cryolophosaurus_ellioti_by_kyoht.jpg