Which one is the Better Tank?

[scubasteve06]

I voted 135, seeing as you keep a lot of CA/SA's they'd probably appreciate the extra running room(length wise) than the turning room.

 

[balton777]

Alright, you guys keep voting and I'll be back later.

 

[FSM]

What kind of fish will be in it? I'd rather have a new 6x1.5 than a scratched up 5x2, since a fish that gets too big for a 18 inch depth is too big for a 5 foot tank IMO.

 

[pcfriedrich]

I said 156, unless it is really messed up. bigger is better.

 

[pcfriedrich]

What kind of fish will be in it? I'd rather have a new 6x1.5 than a scratched up 5x2, since a fish that gets too big for a 18 inch depth is too big for a 5 foot tank IMO.

good point.

 

[headbanger_jib]

keep the bigger tank
bigger tank bigger possilbilities

 

[scubasteve06]

What kind of fish will be in it? I'd rather have a new 6x1.5 than a scratched up 5x2, since a fish that gets too big for a 18 inch depth is too big for a 5 foot tank IMO.

Balton, what are you going to stock it with?

 

[USMCtanker]

go big or go home lol, a always say the bigger the better when it comes to monster fish

 

[balton777]

Thanks you guys. I've decided to keep the 156g tank and sell the 135g to my friend.

It's stocked with 6 little IT Dats, 2 bichirs, an F0 pike cichlid and 3 little 2" F1 Festae fry from my last spawn...for now.

 

[TheFanatic]

First I was thinking, well keep whichever is Oceanic, but both are Oceanic. Best tanks IMHO.

Then I see you would have to tear it down to get rid of the 156. Dump the 135.

I've noticed a lot of scratches on my 110 Oceanic and am thinking of turning it around the next time I move. I don't think the back side is as scratched....Something to consider.