I would say to definately always go wider. I was going to buy that tank also if your talking about the acrylic one but I did not think 17" height was enough. It would be really good for rays and aros tho
Rob Jumchai said:hi,i'm new here and i'm an owner of a red tail golden arowana. I just recently purchased it from a reputable petshop. I was wondering if any of you can help me understand why my arowana keeps getting frightened everytime people go near the tank. It's still young at 7 inches.
Vcygnus1 said:I think I will go with the wider tank then. I would prefer a large tank but it is not in my budget at the moment. So... 125 it is
). Imagine you find out next year that you want to upgrade your 125 gal. Then it'll be $1068 or more. Basically, if you wait and then go for 220 gal, you'd not only get a bigger tank but also save almost $700 towards your upgrade. Because the desire to upgrade is inevitable
redtailfool said:for freshwater , nothing beats a wide tank. If you want to do reef, a tall narrow tank is desirable sometimes...
You have to think that most fish kept in marine aquariums (about 100-150 gal) are probally only gonna be 4-5 inches tops. That is by all means not a guideline, but most reef aquariums do not have big inhabitants. And most reef aquariums have live rock and corals stacked against the back wall forming different levels or terraces in the tank and giving fish different areas to swim or sit. This also expands their territories.SteveO said:You 'almost' never want a tall tank. Sure you get viewing area, but you comprimise swimming room for fish. Think about it, fish swim left to right, only when stressed do they swim bottom to top. A tall tank is never desirable for saltwater... reef tanks need a larger surface area, because fish in the ocean inhabit a very large, wide open area.
72x24x17.Width is almost always better than height.Vcygnus1 said:I am looking to get a large (120-135) gallon tank from glasscages.com and the two sizes are 72x18x25 tall or 72x24x17 tall which one is a better size?