Why a weekly 50% WC is better than two weekly 25% WCs

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
JTRG05;5159067; said:
There are so many people arguing this thread. What exactly IS the conclusion?

And wouldn't the average of 25% water change on the end of the 3rd day have a lower average ppm than that of 50% water changes at the end of the 7th day?

At the end of 14 days I observed an average of 24.620 for 25% changes, and 25.625 for 50% changes. I used a runaway ppm amount, 5ppm per day increasing, could it be in heavier stocked tanks with higher ppm increases the smaller more often water changes are more effective, or are they in general? Is my math wrong or is this in support of the previous data?


In any case my 6 neon tetras in my 55 gallon don't need much of a water change...
the conlusion is on the #1 post of this thread by the OP, regarding this discussion.
 
vfc;5159168; said:
Your calculations are correct. However, starting with 0 nitrates, it takes about 40 days for the pattern to normalize. See attached charts with your parameters (5ppms/day, start with 0 nitrate). 50% weekly (I use 6 days) has a lower nitrate average than the 25% every 3 days.

Thank you, I find this very interesting. Could it be that in the first 40 days of nitrates appearing in a tank, say the end of a cycle in a new tank, it would be more effective to use the multiple 25% water change method opposed to the once 50% change? And then once the tank is established switch over to the 50% water change method once a week? This is assuming you are using fish for your cycle and not other methods, as nitrate levels without livestock would not matter.
 
This thread gives me a headache. Just do water changes on a regular basis, and enjoy life.


85514058.JM8in0AI.endTHREAD.jpg
 
vfc;5158991; said:
I managed a group of engineers and you remind me of a couple of them who suffered from "analysis paralysis". They would hang on to some little detail (like looking at all the trees; arguing over the randomness of the space between them, and not realizing they are in a forest). They wasted a lot of time in our group meetings.

To help you get over your paralysis; please keep in mind the OP's original post used an AVERAGE of 3ppms per day to show how weekly 50% WCs maintain a lower AVERAGE ppms per week.

Sure any given day the ppms will vary from the average 3ppms/day. Some days you will feed more and the next day ppms may be 4. Occasionally you clean the filters and vacuum the gravel; those days the ppms may be 1 to 2. Some weeks you may average 2.5ppms; other weeks it may be 3.5ppms.

However, over a longer period of time, the average for the OP's tank will be 3ppms/day; and the 50% weekly WCs will be better.

Now knowing your over-analysis tendencies; I suspect you will go make a manual calculation with daily varying ppms. Take 70 (10 weeks) random numbers varying from 0-6(ppms) that average 3. Manually calculate the nitrates for each of the 10 weeks with 25/2 and 50/1 WCs, then average up the results. You will find that the results will be the same as the OPs results.
Really? From your thread
vfc;5157648; said:
Solid waste out of sight is easy to overlook as a source of nitrates. The longer it sits in a filter, the more likely it will start to break down an end up as nitrates.


The more solid waste that sits on top on the gravel is better than solid waste trapped in multiple filters. I vacuum the solid waste off the gravel in the collection areas during each weekly WC; takes but a few seconds to move my drain tube down to the bottom of the tank and suck up the waste.
If fish produce "x" amount of waste daily, which produces nitrate at daily rate of "y"
1st day, nitrate increases at (xy)
2nd day, nitrate increases at (x2y+xy) or (3xy)
3rd day, nitrate increases at (x3y+x2y+xy) or (6xy)
3.5th day, nitrate increases at (x3.5y+x2.5y+x1.5y+x0.5y) or (8xy)
4th day, nitrate increases at (x4y+x3y+x2y+xy) or (10xy)
5th day, nitrate increases at (x5y+x4y+x3y+x2y+xy) or (15xy)
6th day, nitrate increases at (x6y+x5y+x4y+x3y+x2y+xy) or (21xy)
7th day, nitrate increases at (x7y+x6y+x5y+x4y+x3y+x2y+xy) or (28xy)

With 50% wc weekly, at 7th day, nitrate level is at 28xy, and reduced to 14xy after wc.

With 25% wc twice a week, at 3.5th day, nitrate level is at 8xy, and reduced to 6xy after wc. At 7th day, nitrate level is 14xy, and reduced to 10.5xy after wc

The flaw from OP theory is he used constant rate for nitrate increment, and dismiss the important of waste removal from frequently wc.
 
jlnguyen74;5159551; said:
Really? From your thread

If fish produce "x" amount of waste daily, which produces nitrate at daily rate of "y"
1st day, nitrate increases at (xy)
2nd day, nitrate increases at (x2y+xy) or (3xy)
3rd day, nitrate increases at (x3y+x2y+xy) or (6xy)
3.5th day, nitrate increases at (x3.5y+x2.5y+x1.5y+x0.5y) or (8xy)
4th day, nitrate increases at (x4y+x3y+x2y+xy) or (10xy)
5th day, nitrate increases at (x5y+x4y+x3y+x2y+xy) or (15xy)
6th day, nitrate increases at (x6y+x5y+x4y+x3y+x2y+xy) or (21xy)
7th day, nitrate increases at (x7y+x6y+x5y+x4y+x3y+x2y+xy) or (28xy)

....

You have two major flaws in your thinking.
1 - Your calculations are based on a start up from 0 nitrates (same problem JTRG05 had on the previous page). Try picking up the calculation at day 40-50 where the nitrate levels have normalized.
2 - Solid waste does not break down into nitrate enough in 3.5 days to make that much of a difference. Most of the nitrate is coming from urine and long-term decay of solid matter (fish waste and dead driftwood/plants) trapped in the filter(s) for a few months.

BTW - I did laid-off one of those A-P guys; low productivity was the justification.
 
I kept wondering why my numbers didn't match up with your's vfc, I accounted for a "weekly" water change of 50%, ie 7 days, your data represents 6 days.

It appears that if 50% is changed every 6 days instead of 7 it is more effective than that of 25% water changes every 3 days (which mathematically makes sense).

Water changes of 25% every 3 days is more effective than that of 50% water changes every 7 however, which is what confused me. The one day did make a noticable difference, even at a normalized, later date.

I will admit however that on a small scale like that which nitrates are measured, the difference is not significant unless you are a terrible fish keeper with a HUGE amount of nitrates.
 
vfc;5159831; said:
BTW - I did laid-off one of those A-P guys; low productivity was the justification.

What does this or your 45 years of keeping fish have anything to do? Are you so inscure that your theory is not so convincing, and put those in your post, to give it more credit?
Pick any number of ppm to start both tank with, 20ppm, for instance

With 50% wc weekly, at 7th day, nitrate level is at 20ppm+28xy, and reduced to 10ppm+14xy after wc.

With 25% wc twice a week, at 3.5th day, nitrate level is at 20ppm+8xy, and reduced to 15ppm+6xy after wc. At 7th day, nitrate level is 15ppm+14xy, and reduced to 11.5ppm+10.5xy after wc

Nitrate level in tank one is still higher in tank two at 7 days
 
jlnguyen74;5159551; said:
If fish produce "x" amount of waste daily, which produces nitrate at daily rate of "y"
1st day, nitrate increases at (xy)
2nd day, nitrate increases at (x2y+xy) or (3xy)
3rd day, nitrate increases at (x3y+x2y+xy) or (6xy)
3.5th day, nitrate increases at (x3.5y+x2.5y+x1.5y+x0.5y) or (8xy)
4th day, nitrate increases at (x4y+x3y+x2y+xy) or (10xy)
5th day, nitrate increases at (x5y+x4y+x3y+x2y+xy) or (15xy)
6th day, nitrate increases at (x6y+x5y+x4y+x3y+x2y+xy) or (21xy)
7th day, nitrate increases at (x7y+x6y+x5y+x4y+x3y+x2y+xy) or (28xy)

With 50% wc weekly, at 7th day, nitrate level is at 28xy, and reduced to 14xy after wc.

With 25% wc twice a week, at 3.5th day, nitrate level is at 8xy, and reduced to 6xy after wc. At 7th day, nitrate level is 14xy, and reduced to 10.5xy after wc

The flaw from OP theory is he used constant rate for nitrate increment, and dismiss the important of waste removal from frequently wc.

:idea: now i see why you are so confused :idea:

you are talking about removing nitrate-producing-waste via water change. you do NOT remove nitrate-producing-waste with a water change, only vacuuming (or cleaning filters... etc....) will remove nitrate-producing-waste.

you're thinking of vacuuming (or cleaning filters... etc....) 2x a week + 25% water change 2x a week.

to keep it fair, you would also have to vacuum the other tank 2x a week and do 1 50% water change. -doing it this way, the 50% tank still has the advantage.

the only way you are right is by doing it your unfair way: vacuuming the the 25% tank 2x a week while only vacuuming the 50% tank 1x a week.

you are thinking and talking about something entirely different than the rest of us, it's no wonder why you don't understand.

if you don't understand this now, you are beyond any hope of help... but i will do my best damn it!
 
ScatMan;5160566; said:
:idea: now i see why you are so confused :idea:

you are talking about removing nitrate-producing-waste via water change. you do NOT remove nitrate-producing-waste with a water change, only vacuuming (or cleaning filters... etc....) will remove nitrate-producing-waste.

you're thinking of vacuuming (or cleaning filters... etc....) 2x a week + 25% water change 2x a week.

to keep it fair, you would also have to vacuum the other tank 2x a week and do 1 50% water change. -doing it this way, the 50% tank still has the advantage.

the only way you are right is by doing it your unfair way: vacuuming the the 25% tank 2x a week while only vacuuming the 50% tank 1x a week.

you are thinking and talking about something entirely different than the rest of us, it's no wonder why you don't understand.

if you don't understand this now, you are beyond any hope of help... but i will do my best damn it!
What do you do when you doing water change? You just take out water, without vaccuuming? And how can someone vacuum a tank twice a week when he only do 1x weekly water change? :screwy:
 
jlnguyen74;5158949; said:
So, if I flip the coin 1,000,000 times, how many heads and how many tails as provent fact that I'm going to get?

the proven fact is that you have the same odds of it landing on heads as you do landing on tails.

the real life tests, on average, prove this fact.

did i really need to explain that?
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com