we know that. the question is WHY is it on CITES? they are bred and sold by the thousands. why doesnt anybody ever revisit these restrictions to see if theyre still applicable? for the same reasons i said in my above postBlackShark11k;4333614;4333614 said:Because they're CITES listed. All fish/animals/plants on CITES 1 are illegal to own without permit... which, far as i know, are only granted to zoo/aquariums/research foundations with good reason to keep. Lots are imported illegally, too.
Actually, only Scleropages formosus is on CITES 1, other asian aro species are listed but supposedly still illegal? Weird.