XP3 - Not to Impressed.

[Jgray152]

I say this if you like alot of media the Rena is great at holding a large amount of it

but...but.. it has a 'very small cross sectional area!'

You have no clue at all. The poster you quoted was talking about the "volume" to which the rena can hold.

You never answered my question once again, leading me to believe you have no idea what you are talking about.

Can you seriously tell me that a 6x6x12 won't clog any faster than a 12x12x12???With the same flow rates and mechanical load???? Lets go a bit further, lets say they are 40ppi sponges measuring 6x6x12 and 12x12x12. You keep saying I am not figuring in the "other piece of the puzzle" and its not just a simple number. So I am including "volume" as well as "cross section surface area". Well, how about my question now which I have asked YOU many times before without any responce.
BTW, if you don't answer this question, your letting everyone know you have no clue at all.

Are you not answers my question because it will validate all that I have said?

its probably made up.

Jgray is a Hagen spy sent to MFK to dig up sales

Call Hagen and ask for Justin Gray. See if they have an extension for me....lol I just got back from a 16 hour work day running a label printing press. Sure doesn't sound like anything to do with Hagen.

my comments were intended as tounge in cheek. they are not meant to be taken seriously

Its about time you admit to it. Gez... Stop spread misinformation if you don't wan't to be taken seriously....

However it is not fair to the people researching the filters, to have false information posted, which has been done regarding the XPs.

Please quote false information.

 

[Jgray152]

exactly. hence my prior "bickering" with Jgray.

Bickering about something you know nothing about...

maybe the small cross sectional area is actually a bonus. Because of the narrow waterway the water actually hits more biomedia on each pass going through the XP filters

I hope your kidding, because what you said is completly wrong in so many ways.

 

[Toddo]

Geez....let it go already.

 

[nickelnutz]

You have no clue at all. The poster you quoted was talking about the "volume" to which the rena can hold.

You never answered my question once again, leading me to believe you have no idea what you are talking about.

Can you seriously tell me that a 6x6x12 won't clog any faster than a 12x12x12???With the same flow rates and mechanical load???? Lets go a bit further, lets say they are 40ppi sponges measuring 6x6x12 and 12x12x12. You keep saying I am not figuring in the "other piece of the puzzle" and its not just a simple number. So I am including "volume" as well as "cross section surface area". Well, how about my question now which I have asked YOU many times before without any responce.
BTW, if you don't answer this question, your letting everyone know you have no clue at all.

Are you not answers my question because it will validate all that I have said?


Call Hagen and ask for Justin Gray. See if they have an extension for me....lol I just got back from a 16 hour work day running a label printing press. Sure doesn't sound like anything to do with Hagen.


Its about time you admit to it. Gez... Stop spread misinformation if you don't wan't to be taken seriously....

Please quote false information.

Of course the 6x6x12 is going to clog faster, it has the smaller surface area, the cross section of a filter pad has very little to do with how fast a filter will clog. I gotta say that I'm really confused as to why you keep bringing up the cross section like it matters so much.

Since I answered does that mean that everyone knows I have a clue now?

 

[Jgray152]

Of course the 6x6x12 is going to clog faster, it has the smaller surface area, the cross section of a filter pad has very little to do with how fast a filter will clog. I gotta say that I'm really confused as to why you keep bringing up the cross section like it matters so much.

Since I answered does that mean that everyone knows I have a clue now?

You almost have a clue. The cross section has very little to do with clogging? Its a contributing factor that many don't take into consideration. You took a step forward and then backwards. You also contridicted your self. If the cross section surface area has little to do, then why did you pick the answer you did?

Unless you are talking about, it has a lower volume. If you wan't to do this again with both equaliing the same volume but with a smaller cross section surface area then here it is.

6x6x48 vs. 12x12x12. Both have the same volume. What is your answer now?

Its rediculous I have to go this far just so some that say "you are wrong" can be proven wrong and just not accept the facts that is presented before them. I have a problem with people telling me how full of S*** I am when I am stating facts. Its common sence.

Do you see high flow volume filters with a very small cross section surface area? No. There is a reason for this. They are expected to filter large mechanical loads at high flow rates. Using a filter with a cross section surface area that is to small will clog up to quick for it to be worth anything. Research on the net. Everything you find will prove my point.

 

[Jgray152]

In actuality the motor does not heat up, the increased amperage from the motor working to hard heats the conductors and the overloads wired to the motor.

You are also taking more about current responsive protection.

 

[cassharper]

now I'm sad, no one is dissecting my arguments picking apart the minutia





damn

 

[sutherland]

now I'm sad, no one is dissecting my arguments picking apart the minutia





damn

haha, one should be so lucky.

 

[Jgray152]

now I'm sad, no one is dissecting my arguments picking apart the minutia





damn

Your grammar is horrible and you need to capitalize your starting words in your paragraph as well tell your self your lucky Im just kidding, I never look that deep into someones post.

 

[rallysman]

aaannnnnnnd cut!