I knew exactly who it was before I even clicked the link. But what I don't understand is how does a reputable person like him say "its just a fish" among several other similar statements? Am I misunderstanding what his actual tone was in the blogs? I'm not arguing I am truly asking what the meaning was besides the acclimation of a primarily sw species into a fw habitat. That argument is a completely unwinnable one on either side...being that there are 100's of examples of sw and fw fish "switching it up" for one reason or another.Idk if you've been around here long but this is wes wongs blog... One of the best vendors HERE (I think he's the best)... A Very credible fish keeper many hardcore members here can also agree, he's been keeping fish longer than I've been alive.... To say that he doesn't care about his fish is probably the most interesting thing I've heard today....
I guess my point is don't say something like: "idk where aquarists get the idea they can keep these fish in freshwater etc" especially when a pioneer in rare fish and fish keeping has done otherwise. I just proved divemaster wrong in the last link if you even looked at it... That grouper was caught in the Rio Suriname alongside peacock bass... If you know anything about it the Rio Suriname is a very acidic and soft water River with some black water tributaries although some parts of the main channel appear to be clear water (still very very acidic)... Just a thought.... Hopefully wes can chime in on this thread. This topic has been covered before. Recently I saw a video on YouTube where in a aquarium in Korea, sw fish were kept in fw and vice versa. There were armatus payara swimming with marine fish. Was really cool they even had some feeding time and the fish ate with much gusto... Just another thought...
Sent from my iPhone using MonsterAquariaNetwork app
as for the fw/sw combo in korea...wasn't that that crazy "magic water" tank?