Environmental zealotry often leads to unnecessary prohibitions. For example, snakeheads are banned in Ontario. In BC, where the climate is actually warmer, snakeheads are legal (and not exactly invading BCs waterways).
Actually there has been a lake that is believed to have piranha in it in Minnesota.... It was on the Discovery channel a while back....nicholasdances;5042542; said:obviously i understand why alot of fish are illegal in warmer places. BUT I LIVE IN CT. the lakes here get covered with 3 feet of ice. please someone explain to me what a piranha or giant snakehead could do if released in lakes up here. answer....NOTHING.
there are plenty of snakeheads that cant live hereSpiritofthesoul;5042521; said:Actually I don't think a fish which couldn't survive in the wild where you live is typically considered an illegal fish
[with a few exceptions (reason 1)]
Generally I can only consider 2 main reasons why certain type of fish are illegal in where you live.
1. Extinction, some of them are at the brisk of extinction and laws are passed to give those species a higher chance of survival in the wild by ensuring none (few) of them are caught for aquarium trades
2. Quite the opposite. Those fish would spread like wildfires once they are release in the wild. They would breed quickly and upset the natural balance of that ecosystem, threatening the survival of the local species. A good example would be the Snakehead.
Hence a fish which isn't driven to the point of extinction and would not survive in local waters generally isn't illegal since even if you release them. They would just die and rot/get eaten and would have little impact on the ecosystem. There are also a few various reason why certain fishes are illegal but I won't go into them.
thisSimonL;5042553; said:Environmental zealotry often leads to unnecessary prohibitions. For example, snakeheads are banned in Ontario. In BC, where the climate is actually warmer, snakeheads are legal (and not exactly invading BCs waterways).
These cases almost always end up being Pacu or completely false.RTC GAR TSN;5042554; said:Actually there has been a lake that is believed to have piranha in it in Minnesota.... It was on the Discovery channel a while back....
Is that why a scientist went to the lake and caught a red belly piranha???Chaz88;5042564; said:These cases almost always end up being Pacu or completely false.
where is ur proof?? ill help you out, there isnt any. unless the piranha was released and caught by him 15 min after he let it go.RTC GAR TSN;5042566; said:Is that why a scientist went to the lake and caught a red belly piranha???
I used the word "almost" because anything is possible under the correct circumstances.RTC GAR TSN;5042566; said:Is that why a scientist went to the lake and caught a red belly piranha???