New DSLR: Critique/Advice Welcomed

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Trust me the speedlight is going to happen very soon and I can see why now. Can I ask why the third shot over the first is your favorite? I thought the first was my best of those three. What are you seeing over the first, I may be missing? Don't worry I won't get offended I'm asking a trained eye to tell me what you think? So be honest ;)

the issue with the first pic, is that, the subject is not very appealing, its quite dark and obscure.

where as the second pic although quite decently lit, it still is dull, and many parts of the subject are sinking into the background, with no clear outline, and there is no detail or sharpness due to inadequate light

the third pic although has uneven light, has niice high and low tones, and the features of the fish are quite distinct and sharp, although the eye is still missing, really niice pics are those, where you can have eye contact with the subject. i liked this pic because of the play of light and the sharpness it has near the tail, the head and mouth, this pic would have been much better with more light on the flanks of the body, but i think for that u will need to reduce the fnumber a little more, most of the good photographers whom i have asked for advice and help, always tell me to start with the fnumber at 8 and to keep the shutter speed at the highest speed it can sync with the flash, usually thats 200, and then increase the fnumber till u see evenly lit subject with niiice smooth exposures and theres no clipping
 
the issue with the first pic, is that, the subject is not very appealing, its quite dark and obscure.

where as the second pic although quite decently lit, it still is dull, and many parts of the subject are sinking into the background, with no clear outline, and there is no detail or sharpness due to inadequate light

the third pic although has uneven light, has niice high and low tones, and the features of the fish are quite distinct and sharp, although the eye is still missing, really niice pics are those, where you can have eye contact with the subject. i liked this pic because of the play of light and the sharpness it has near the tail, the head and mouth, this pic would have been much better with more light on the flanks of the body, but i think for that u will need to reduce the fnumber a little more, most of the good photographers whom i have asked for advice and help, always tell me to start with the fnumber at 8 and to keep the shutter speed at the highest speed it can sync with the flash, usually thats 200, and then increase the fnumber till u see evenly lit subject with niiice smooth exposures and theres no clipping

That makes perfect sense and thank you for explaining what you see. Modest_Man also suggested I try F8, not sure why I didn't start there so I will work on that today. The lighting on this tank are Marineland LED's and the bulbs for the LED's are spaced about 2" abart from one another so the lighting will always be uneven until I get a speedlight. I can see that effect of the lighting on the fish now that you mention it.
 
Thanks Jose. Are you saying the first, second, third or fourth set are nice? Which is best do you think since I am using different settings for each and courious?
hard to say the 3rd and 4th ar enic ebut i think the 4th set is better because the edge of the fishes body all around is crisp and not fuzzy
 
Nice pics for a n0ob! ;)

Most lenses will be at their sharpest in the f8 range. Anything after that and lens diffraction starts to become an issue. In lower end lenses, this is very apparent.

Any speed light like the sb600 (if you can still find those) are fine. What's more important is having more than one, especially for monster sized fish. Don't get caught up in the hype around the sb900/910 flash. Overkill for fish imo.

Start considering things like "rule of thirds" and composition while you learn which settings work best.

For the most part, a tripod is required for good FTS shots due to slower shutter speed and higher ISO.

Once you get a speed flash or two, then we can talk more. ;)

You are definitely on the right path tho!
 
The pics are looking alot better. I tried the shutter speed at 200 and dropped the fnumber to 11 and its alot darker than your pics and my tank is only 19" tall and i moved the light directly over the subject. were you using a flash with those pics? then i dropped the fnumber even lower and it got brighter but i am having trouble getting the subject to look like yours with the background blacked out...
 
Nice pics for a n0ob! ;)

Most lenses will be at their sharpest in the f8 range. Anything after that and lens diffraction starts to become an issue. In lower end lenses, this is very apparent.

Any speed light like the sb600 (if you can still find those) are fine. What's more important is having more than one, especially for monster sized fish. Don't get caught up in the hype around the sb900/910 flash. Overkill for fish imo.

Start considering things like "rule of thirds" and composition while you learn which settings work best.

For the most part, a tripod is required for good FTS shots due to slower shutter speed and higher ISO.

Once you get a speed flash or two, then we can talk more. ;)

You are definitely on the right path tho!

Thanks very much for the feedback Gerry! I really appreciate it, especially from you.

The pics are looking alot better. I tried the shutter speed at 200 and dropped the fnumber to 11 and its alot darker than your pics and my tank is only 19" tall and i moved the light directly over the subject. were you using a flash with those pics? then i dropped the fnumber even lower and it got brighter but i am having trouble getting the subject to look like yours with the background blacked out...

The first set of pics is with flash but the second two sets are not. The last pics were taken flash off, F12 and shutter speed of 200. I have a double bright Marineland LED lights on the tank (120 gallon) and wait until he is just under the light before taking the pic. You can tell because if you look close in the last pic I posted, you will notice the brighter lighting about ever two inches on the fish where the bulbs are. I have another trick up my sleeve I am going to try tonight when I get home about 9pm in absense of a speedlight that will help and I will shoot it at F8. Stay tuned...
 
What do you guys think on this set? F8 is by far the best shot at so far. You guys don't want to know what I did for light.. :duh:

DSC_0075.JPG
DSC_0073.JPG
DSC_0060.JPG
DSC_0044.JPG
DSC_0078.JPG

DSC_0075.JPG

DSC_0073.JPG

DSC_0060.JPG

DSC_0044.JPG

DSC_0078.JPG
 
Beautiful shots of gorgeous fish Justin... wow .. love your new camera..
 
What do you guys think on this set? F8 is by far the best shot at so far. You guys don't want to know what I did for light.. :duh:

View attachment 731571
View attachment 731572
View attachment 731573
View attachment 731574
View attachment 731575

I'd recommend shooting in RAW and then edit the white balance after you shoot (or choose the correct white balance before shooting in .jpeg)...your white balance is all funky in this set. I'm free most any day from Monday evening on, barring Wed. if you want to do a "photo shoot".
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com