Official Off Topic Discussion Thread #1

[Hendre]

This whole election thing is rather amusing.

In other news our resident chief finance minister is being relieved of duty now that he has starting digging up fraudulent and corrupt transactions and documents relating to the Presidents family and their ties

 

[krichardson]

Has anyone heard about Madonna's comments regarding the favor she will perform for you if you vote for Hil liary.....WOW!

 

[pops]

there is a madonna walking the streets in every town, I would rather pay the 20 bucks. again if I vote its going to be for the libertarian.

 

[Warborg]

Has anyone heard about Madonna's comments regarding the favor she will perform for you if you vote for Hil liary.....WOW!

You know when Obama won, Blacks all around America rejoiced knowing that this now means they themselves could be President. If Hillary wins, mastermind criminals will rejoice with the knowledge that they can be known killers, thieves and other related crimes and still be President.

....only in America. What the F**k is wrong with us?

 

[pops]

its not so much us, as the options before us. at the moment there is no strong, moral leader that is willing to run,

 

[Warborg]

its not so much us, as the options before us. at the moment there is no strong, moral leader that is willing to run,

I get it that one is a crazy person but the other one is a massive criminal...it's a no brainer. At the very least a third party should get 40-50% but that won't happen.

 

[ehh]

do we get to talk about politics in here? the only person that talks to me about politics is my brother and thats so he can call me a "libtard"...*insert robert downey jr eyeball*... he's also my younger brother.. which i think is obvious lol.


forgetting about any of the controversies like the bengazi deal and trump casually talking about groping women. and forgetting about your political swing (even though i know that is like pulling teeth from an alligator)...
i also feel the decision is a no brainer. even with the all the scandal behind clinton, how can someone support appointing a person with zero political history into a very powerful, political position? he's not applying for a position at mcdonalds. this isn't really a position that you learn on the job. you have to have some kind of understanding of how the complex ball that is politics rolls. and as the country has grown and evolved over time, wouldn't you agree its best to "hire" someone that has been up to bat few times and instead of only being in the bleachers? that alone i think is reason enough to support trump not being in office. i am only a clinton supporter because she is the direct opposition to trump. i don't wish we had better candidates. they both would not be my first choice. haven't you ever heard the phrase to not put all your eggs in one basket? thats what you do with trump. at least with clinton you can rest assure that she has a good idea of what is going on. at your job, do you think its best to hire someone with for management position that has 1) never worked for the company and 2) has no management experience or to hire from within? thats what you're doing by electing trump. you're hiring that first person to manage your business. is that really the person you would want in power position at your job? is that really the person you want in power of your country?
i would bet money that every president after the civil war has had some background in politics. i cannot believe that he has gotten as far as he has in the election.
you're right warborg... What the F**k is wrong with us.

 

[skjl47]

how can someone support appointing a person with zero political history into a very powerful, political position?

hello; For many this lack of political history is the attraction. Many are fed up with the career politicians.

at least with clinton you can rest assure that she has a good idea of what is going on.

Hello; Yes with Clinton we can be sure of the political machine she is a part of. Many of the folks at the Clinton Foundation Machine (CFM) are reported to have shuttled into political positions and out back into the Clinton Foundation machine. In with Bill then out to the CFM. In with Hillary at Sec State then out to the CFM. I guess they are poised to move back into her administration should she win.

Yes she knows what is going on and how to work the system. That is the essence of the issue with HRC. She and her team have been a part of the government we have now. Her contributions to the way things currently are one of the bigger reasons to oppose her as CIC.

has 1) never worked for the company and 2) has no management experience or to hire from within? thats what you're doing by electing trump.

Hello; I go along with #1. Trump has not held a political position. To many that is a plus. I think #2 is off base. Trump has more real world management experience than Clinton. Political positions do not equate to running a business. Again we do know much about the way HRC has managed things as a senator. (Voted for the Iroc invasion in 2003. It was the political thing to do at the time. That alone is reason enough to not vote for her. Later said the war was a mistake, again the political thing to do at the time.)

Perhaps the key thing to consider in this election is the supreme court. The difference between what sort of judge will be appointed is clear. 2nd amendment. Open borders. ( The dream of open borders for the Americas vs. border security).

Interesting our congress, which is full of career politicians, has so very low a rating and that somehow electing a career politician is supposed to be the better choice.

 

[FMA4ME]

hello; For many this lack of political history is the attraction. Many are fed up with the career politicians.


Hello; Yes with Clinton we can be sure of the political machine she is a part of. Many of the folks at the Clinton Foundation Machine (CFM) are reported to have shuttled into political positions and out back into the Clinton Foundation machine. In with Bill then out to the CFM. In with Hillary at Sec State then out to the CFM. I guess they are poised to move back into her administration should she win.

Yes she knows what is going on and how to work the system. That is the essence of the issue with HRC. She and her team have been a part of the government we have now. Her contributions to the way things currently are one of the bigger reasons to oppose her as CIC.



Hello; I go along with #1. Trump has not held a political position. To many that is a plus. I think #2 is off base. Trump has more real world management experience than Clinton. Political positions do not equate to running a business. Again we do know much about the way HRC has managed things as a senator. (Voted for the Iroc invasion in 2003. It was the political thing to do at the time. That alone is reason enough to not vote for her. Later said the war was a mistake, again the political thing to do at the time.)

Perhaps the key thing to consider in this election is the supreme court. The difference between what sort of judge will be appointed is clear. 2nd amendment. Open borders. ( The dream of open borders for the Americas vs. border security).

Interesting our congress, which is full of career politicians, has so very low a rating and that somehow electing a career politician is supposed to be the better choice.

Absolutely, and thank you. I didn't want to attract mods but since there is no turning back, great points. I for one am sick of and I'll quote Mr. Trump from the first debate, "typical politicians", the thought of open borders, rewarding fence jumpers sickens me even more, and no that does not make me racist.

 

[ehh]

¯\_(ツ)_/¯