The @deadliestrodent supposedly had a water allergenThe craziest allergy out of all my friends is one that cannot eat beef and almost any other red meat...
Feel more bad for her boyfriend though as he loves beef and if he eats it, cant kiss her for basically 24hrs lol...
lol. Ca has done that on just about everything for decades now, that's just how they are with things out there. Now on the other hand if a different state had it, then I would most likely do some reasearch on it for myself. But a Cali label, nope.The @deadliestrodent supposedly had a water allergen
I agree with this entirely. This could avoid situations like “the boy who cried wolf” with these products.Are the producers of these products and states that have to put warnings on everything concerned with consumer desensitization? Some products are actually really harmful to the user...and if all these common products that are really not dangerous to the user has all these warnings the users are going to ignore the warnings bc it is literally on everything....
I can say even from reading this thread a lot of people are already brushing the warnings aside. If the company’s are made to use the labels they should also be made to list the dangerous chemical and what specifically causes harm. That way the user can do additional research if they choose to and then decide for them selves if they want to be “exposed” to using the product/chemical, don’t just leave us guessing as to why or what is dangerous about the product.
Yep we have those warnings here as well. The ones that really crack me up are the ones on Tv commercials. The commercial will be some far fetched thing that is impossible to do like a guy flying through the air or something equally dumb, and then at the bottom of the screen it will say "do not attempt" lol. Just companies having to cover their butts from lawsuits I guess.


