Hello; I am having a similar discussion about the virus on a different forum. One fellow has been talking about the non-sterilizing nature of the new vaccines. I finally did some searching to see what he has been trying to say. Some things seem to have clicked into place after reading some links. For example how can a vaccinated person can have a nasal viral load the same or greater than an unvaccinated sick person. I get it much better. Here are some links, but there are plenty of others. I also add a copy of the post I made in the other site. I still have questions.
COVID-19 Vaccines and Sterilizing Immunity: Goals and Progress (verywellhealth.com)
EUA “vaccines” are non-sterilizing. | Welcome to my Pandemic Hobby Blog (macryan.com)
Coronavirus: few vaccines prevent infection – here's why that's not a problem (theconversation.com)
Hello; Three links with focus on sterilizing and non-sterilizing immunity. After some reading some things clicked into place. I am vaccinated with a non-sterilizing vaccine (moderna). Odds are I will be infected with the virus or a variant like delta. I am not really immune, and will likely have a mild infection until a mutated variant shows up that is effectively like a new virus again or the vaccine effects have worn off.
Those who had the virus and recovered naturally without long term problems are likely immune in the traditional sense and if healthy are better protected than me. They also might be able to get a mutated variant some day after the virus has changed. We all are in that boat. They will not have any possible side effects from the vaccine, so that may be a bonus. (Yes, I know the vaccines are supposed to be without risk, but I am not ready to make that call.) ( Yes, I know it is not my call to make outside of my own thinking.) So, I still do not see why the push to have the naturally immune vaccinated. I get they may not all have equal levels of immunity, but they did survive and get well.
So, if I read the links correctly the vaccinated like me are very likely to run into the virus and have a mild case. That I also will shed virus just like a non-vaccinated person who gets ill. So the vaccines are sorta like a mask. Can be somewhat helpful, but not a cure and will not prevent an infection.
I see why the push to get all vaccinated better. The vaccines have big flaws. They work in a way but not in the traditional sense of the older style vaccines. I wonder why I have only been hearing this from so very few such as shogun32. Why have the experts not just said the vaccines have holes in the way they work?
Whatever the reasons the experts in charge had for handling the talk the way they did, the result is they have lost the trust of too many. I can see they have been talking around these things lately. I guess they just do not want to directly say the vaccines are flawed now. However just like the masks, the story is getting out and if they tell it straight even more credibility will be lost. How many months have we been told the vaccines are work real well.
I went round and round on a different site about how can a vaccinated person can have a viral load similar to a sick unvaccinated person. He claimed to have great understanding but was not getting the message thru. He kept telling me the vaccines are working great, or maybe what he was saying they are working the way they are meant to work. That I am not protected from the virus with the vaccine, just that I likely will not get very sick. But I might get sick and may even die with the vaccine. When I get sick I likely will not know it and will be shedding virus to others.
I have not completely digested the notion of how the non-sterilizing vaccines can actually cause a more dangerous virus mutation yet. I do follow the basic concept. If this turns out to be the case the implication seems to be the vaccines could possibly have us wind up with a much worse viral disease than we would have had without the vaccines. I know this does not sound like it ought to be right, but so far such is my take. Again I think shogun32 has been saying this or something like this for a while. It just had not clicked for me.
It would be nice if someone who has understanding and command of the subject could polish the concept in language better than mine.
COVID-19 Vaccines and Sterilizing Immunity: Goals and Progress (verywellhealth.com)
EUA “vaccines” are non-sterilizing. | Welcome to my Pandemic Hobby Blog (macryan.com)
Coronavirus: few vaccines prevent infection – here's why that's not a problem (theconversation.com)
Hello; Three links with focus on sterilizing and non-sterilizing immunity. After some reading some things clicked into place. I am vaccinated with a non-sterilizing vaccine (moderna). Odds are I will be infected with the virus or a variant like delta. I am not really immune, and will likely have a mild infection until a mutated variant shows up that is effectively like a new virus again or the vaccine effects have worn off.
Those who had the virus and recovered naturally without long term problems are likely immune in the traditional sense and if healthy are better protected than me. They also might be able to get a mutated variant some day after the virus has changed. We all are in that boat. They will not have any possible side effects from the vaccine, so that may be a bonus. (Yes, I know the vaccines are supposed to be without risk, but I am not ready to make that call.) ( Yes, I know it is not my call to make outside of my own thinking.) So, I still do not see why the push to have the naturally immune vaccinated. I get they may not all have equal levels of immunity, but they did survive and get well.
So, if I read the links correctly the vaccinated like me are very likely to run into the virus and have a mild case. That I also will shed virus just like a non-vaccinated person who gets ill. So the vaccines are sorta like a mask. Can be somewhat helpful, but not a cure and will not prevent an infection.
I see why the push to get all vaccinated better. The vaccines have big flaws. They work in a way but not in the traditional sense of the older style vaccines. I wonder why I have only been hearing this from so very few such as shogun32. Why have the experts not just said the vaccines have holes in the way they work?
Whatever the reasons the experts in charge had for handling the talk the way they did, the result is they have lost the trust of too many. I can see they have been talking around these things lately. I guess they just do not want to directly say the vaccines are flawed now. However just like the masks, the story is getting out and if they tell it straight even more credibility will be lost. How many months have we been told the vaccines are work real well.
I went round and round on a different site about how can a vaccinated person can have a viral load similar to a sick unvaccinated person. He claimed to have great understanding but was not getting the message thru. He kept telling me the vaccines are working great, or maybe what he was saying they are working the way they are meant to work. That I am not protected from the virus with the vaccine, just that I likely will not get very sick. But I might get sick and may even die with the vaccine. When I get sick I likely will not know it and will be shedding virus to others.
I have not completely digested the notion of how the non-sterilizing vaccines can actually cause a more dangerous virus mutation yet. I do follow the basic concept. If this turns out to be the case the implication seems to be the vaccines could possibly have us wind up with a much worse viral disease than we would have had without the vaccines. I know this does not sound like it ought to be right, but so far such is my take. Again I think shogun32 has been saying this or something like this for a while. It just had not clicked for me.
It would be nice if someone who has understanding and command of the subject could polish the concept in language better than mine.