E. Several rows of scales entering both the dorsal and anal fins.
This is what I was trying to see in mine, do these look like the rows of scales?? Anyway I will try to get a clearer picture.Identifying your Cichlasoma
A while back I posted that I was working on a guide for the hobbyist to identify the twelve species within the genus Cichlasoma. I intended to post the guide all at once but as it has not been easy to locate some species, I've now decided to do it one species at a time. The guide is not intended...www.monsterfishkeepers.com
So C. amazonarum has this further identifying characteristic not found in bimaculatum.
Nice clear pic of bimaculatum here: https://www.reabic.net/journals/bir/2020/1/BIR_2020_Robins_etal.pdf

This is what I was trying to see in mine, do these look like the rows of scales?? Anyway I will try to get a clearer picture.
View attachment 1499495
And yes, nice clear pictures in that article, the scale patterning behind the head actually looks the same as mine now...
Interesting fish! Isn't she xanthic rather than axanthic? (I thought axanthic was lacking yellow pigment but I could be wrong). Have you had offspring from her and if so how did they turn out?Ignore the cloudiness and poor quality, she moves a lot.
View attachment 1499507
View attachment 1499508
View attachment 1499509
View attachment 1499510
I always thought xanthic was the same as axanthic. She's more like leucistic but I've always heard her described as axanthic. I was never able to raise offspring from her before her mate died, but the other guy who bred them found that they breed true.Interesting fish! Isn't she xanthic rather than axanthic? (I thought axanthic was lacking yellow pigment but I could be wrong). Have you had offspring from her and if so how did they turn out?
Well that is good as I have been telling people that is what they are for the last two years! Just saw something recently that made me wonder if I was right..IMO these are amazonarum.