P pophead Feeder Fish MFK Member Oct 24, 2006 194 0 0 edmonton, AB. Canada Nov 17, 2006 #12 I've been fooled! lol I guess 10k gallons would look a lot bigger...
G GooDyboy420 Feeder Fish MFK Member Oct 4, 2006 799 0 0 Wisconsin www.myspace.com Nov 17, 2006 #13 w/e i still would want that tank id spend 4,500 on it!
P pophead Feeder Fish MFK Member Oct 24, 2006 194 0 0 edmonton, AB. Canada Nov 17, 2006 #14 yea it's still worth good money. a new tank a 5th of that size can cost 6grand, so still not bad.
T Tai95 Feeder Fish MFK Member Mar 28, 2006 63 0 0 49 Buffalo Nov 18, 2006 #15 With nothing in the picture to give you scale how can you say the tank isn't 10,000gal?
vanilla__gorilla__ Feeder Fish MFK Member Jan 3, 2006 712 0 0 44 at work Nov 18, 2006 #16 that tank would look good in my fish room
T TOM A. Feeder Fish MFK Member Mar 26, 2006 277 0 0 WEYMOUTH, MA Nov 18, 2006 #17 thats the sump filter. the real tank is in the back
C CHOMPERS Silver Tier VIP MFK Member Apr 28, 2006 6,438 64 1,205 Sunnyvale Trailer Park Nov 18, 2006 #18 Tai95;583482; said: With nothing in the picture to give you scale how can you say the tank isn't 10,000gal? Click to expand... go back to page one and read post eight.
Tai95;583482; said: With nothing in the picture to give you scale how can you say the tank isn't 10,000gal? Click to expand... go back to page one and read post eight.
davo Aimara MFK Member Jan 9, 2006 17,544 43 132 England Nov 18, 2006 #19 TOM A.;583488; said: thats the sump filter. the real tank is in the back Click to expand... LOL
J justin Gambusia MFK Member May 6, 2005 379 4 18 FL Nov 19, 2006 #20 funny, when I looked at it on my computer it says minimum bid is $1100 not $11000. Might want to recheck that.
funny, when I looked at it on my computer it says minimum bid is $1100 not $11000. Might want to recheck that.