LobstersGoPeenchPeench;2230992; said:i think its a wild one from the patterning. see mine has the same finnage designs wbut with more red/orange speckles but his tiger pattern is white.
Only two A. orbilucaris have ever been caught, so they are not a valid species yet.
I don't see anything wrong with it. You're not really hybridizing but breeding the same species for color. I have a wild caught I love to see breed with my Lemon or Platnium. I'd hope it kept the solid body color of the lemon or paltnium and patterns of the F0.Soil;2209916; said:Woa, thats a huge change in coloration. Would never figure a kid like that to turn out normal ^^ Live and learn. Nice O!
Nah it would still be within the same genus, astronotus - if that what you ment with not a true hybrid? Im all new breeding stuff. Some say it is possible to crossbreed between two different genus, but Im not sure what kind of fish would be suitable to put in there. If the two I have now pair of It would be a tiger/red cross, but I guess its not a hybrid unless the tiger isnt ocellatus
He looks like a baby Tiger. Most baby O's ahve that marbled pattern. Here's a pic of my wild caught at a little over an inch. He's changed completelycraig_uk;2304078; said:Evening Gentlemen.
Just a quick update. Saw an oscar on here and have done a little research. Seems its been classified as a colour morph known as "Sunni Lake"![]()
Always nice to put a face to a name eh?
As for your oscar Soil, it seems, based on the pics youve posted earlier that it is infact a Astronotus orbicularis, see the pic i posted on the 2nd page for a full grown adult.
Best of luck with it
Craggy
Danger_Chicken;2336510; said:I don't see anything wrong with it. You're not really hybridizing but breeding the same species for color. I have a wild caught I love to see breed with my Lemon or Platnium. I'd hope it kept the solid body color of the lemon or paltnium and patterns of the F0.
only two have been caughtartemis1;2304317; said:You have a typical oscar, astronotus occelatus. The unusual jaw is just an individual trait, nothing too special. NOT A. orbicularis or A. crassipinnis. Only two A. orbilucaris have ever been caught, so they are not a valid species yet. The genus astronotus is up for "renovation" and it will likely include orbicularis (or orbiculatus as it is sometimes called).
He's not F0 either though, wild oscars have pretty much zero red coloration, and you would have paid a very hefty price for him.
Cheers,
art
where did you get that from, jeff rapps was selling some orbilucaris like a year ago he has also sold crasspinis; please don't post total bs to increase your post count http://tangledupincichlids.com/images/orbic5.jpg http://tangledupincichlids.com/images/crassip2.jpg