uncwnells;3710436; said:I voted for 1 because its the most natural looking photo, what I mean is that there is no blackened out background, and nothing that screams "photoshop" to me, but hey thats my two cents!
marvinbaker;3712308; said:But in defence of the other pics mine was a completely instinctive shot, no flash at all, using the bubbles to provide the light and a real "hit and hope" shot. Some may call it a fluke. Pictures like chaitika's take unbelievable skill, dedication and practice as well as the correct gear. There is no fluke in those pics whatsoever.
marvinbaker;3712308; said:But in defence of the other pics mine was a completely instinctive shot, no flash at all, using the bubbles to provide the light and a real "hit and hope" shot. Some may call it a fluke. Pictures like chaitika's take unbelievable skill, dedication and practice as well as the correct gear. There is no fluke in those pics whatsoever. Each to their own, some prefer the lucky moment shot from an underdog and some appreciate the art form of genius.
Chaitika;3712914; said:Japes, you really seem intent on taking veiled potshots at my photo. I'm not sure why. The truth of the matter is that I have 7 or 8 more pics that are very close to the image above. I have done the very same thing with SEVERAL species of fish so its not as flukey as you want others to think.