3-Bars Indo or ST? Part 2
- Thread starter StIcKy~RiCe
- Start date
i find it foolish for someone to not buy a fish just because it IT even if they like it
would you pay top money for a ST with no neck band patchy forked nasty stripes over a perfect 3 bar IT with full neck band this makes no sence to me
their is more to a tiger than if its IT or ST
would you pay top money for a ST with no neck band patchy forked nasty stripes over a perfect 3 bar IT with full neck band this makes no sence to me
their is more to a tiger than if its IT or ST
Well opinion is opinion neverless....not a fact. In my point of view that the previous owner sold to me as a wide bar, so as far as I see I have to agreed with other that point out the 1st picture are IT and the second one are ST.
But lookl closely to the 7-8" dat in real life on the top of the tail it's attach bar to the last the line. Again it's opinion of mine.
SO im going to say both ST as I for sold to.
Again thank you all for the comment, ID and great conversation in this thread.
But lookl closely to the 7-8" dat in real life on the top of the tail it's attach bar to the last the line. Again it's opinion of mine.
SO im going to say both ST as I for sold to.
Again thank you all for the comment, ID and great conversation in this thread.
T1KARMANN;1708612; said:i find it foolish for someone to not buy a fish just because it IT even if they like it
would you pay top money for a ST with no neck band patchy forked nasty stripes over a perfect 3 bar IT with full neck band this makes no sence to me
their is more to a tiger than if its IT or ST
Yes sir! we get your point now. Again it's just my prefer. Everyone is different and want different. Everyone are not the same.
StIcKy~RiCe;1708614; said:
IT Tail
ST Tail
both completely different so fooling your self into thinking both are STs is just wrong... sorry to say... IT tail is 3 bars ST tail is 1-2 bars
just because it only has 2 body bars doesnt make it a wide bar as I have been told.
after comparing the 2 I would say the second is a ST but the first is deff. a IT
Bushfishrox, you are WRONG that is not a good way at all to ID.
Until some one can say where these two fish were caught I dont think there is ONE person on this forum that can say for certainty what species these fish are from the pics. If you think you can, youre delusional.
Until some one can say where these two fish were caught I dont think there is ONE person on this forum that can say for certainty what species these fish are from the pics. If you think you can, youre delusional.
if you are going to feel much better and happyer with your purchase just because everyone hear tells you they are ST
then yes nice ST thats what they are 100% ST
their cant be that much diffrence between IT and ST if you cant tell the diffrence
then yes nice ST thats what they are 100% ST
their cant be that much diffrence between IT and ST if you cant tell the diffrence
Delusional or not, all we're trying to do is ID some fish that arent easy to identify. All people have with these guys are opinions and some awful ID charts. The way this thread is going, it seems as though any dat is an ST unless proven otherwise.
I mean, afterall, who cares right? ST is just a name and the cash paid for is just some colored paper, so no matter.
And in that case, I'm gonna say my IT (so I thought) is an ST until somebody can PROVE to me what river, swamp, pond, or puddle of water it came out of. And since I dont see how in the heck the first dat can be an ST, I'm gonna go take some medication cause I must be delusional!!
I mean, afterall, who cares right? ST is just a name and the cash paid for is just some colored paper, so no matter.
And in that case, I'm gonna say my IT (so I thought) is an ST until somebody can PROVE to me what river, swamp, pond, or puddle of water it came out of. And since I dont see how in the heck the first dat can be an ST, I'm gonna go take some medication cause I must be delusional!!
