Abortion poll

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo

abortion

  • I support abortion

    Votes: 45 67.2%
  • I do not support abortion.

    Votes: 22 32.8%

  • Total voters
    67
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
DavidW;729757; said:
Your anti abortion stance is from a distorted sense of moral superiority generated by your religion and you have no right to impose either your religion or your strained sense of religious morality on other people.

It is a woman's inalienable right to choose for herself, everyone else should just butt the hell out, its none of your damned business.

Maybe concentrate a bit more on living a better life yourself..as your bible tells you.....
" judge not and be not judged"
" let he that is without sin cast the first stone"

well said
 
Miguel;729696; said:
it is murder. And the woman should think of her "rights" before getting pregnant, not after. All serious pro abortion arguments are understandable but they don't compare to a life that is thrown away. that life is the most supreme value of all...

We are murders, we kill without thought. Life is life what makes humans so important?
 
I'm Pro choice. Making it illegal won't make it go away, it'll only endager lives. The wealthy will have it done somewhere else, the poor will have it done illegally, or worse.
 
DavidW;729844; said:
this is the same kind of argument made by eric rudolph, the guy who was bombing family planning clinics and killing people here in the US. his actions are the direct result of acting out this kind of prejudice ( using the word 'murder' in your context)
"In the name of faith, you hate, for the professed goal of saving human life, you killed"
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/18/AR2005071801293.html

I see you live in Portugal so I guess that your morality ( and/or religion) probably come from Catholicism......the same Catholic church that currently has a pope that was a member of hitler youth? the same organization that has bankrupted itself in the US to pay all the damages awarded by the courts for their paedophile priests? crusades...pogroms...inquisitions etc etc ad nauseam?
Not that any other branch of any religion is any better, but really, think deeply about where you take your spiritual sustenance and moral guidance, most sources are corrupted and moraly bankrupt and will corrupt you along with them.
This is why they exist and how they perpetuate themselves


Very well said, I agree 100% with everything you said.

PRO-CHOICE, if it's not your body shut the hell up. We don't tell you not to believe in your gods just cause we don't, keep your nose out of other peoples business.
 
If you say you are against the right to choose could only mean you have not thought of many scenarios of why abortion may have been needed in the first place.

e.g.your wife and brilliant mother to 2 children already is told if she continues with her pregnancy she has an 80% chance of dying herself.

There are other people to think about here(two already dependant children, a loving husband and family) Those against the right to choose abortion are often misguided or ill informed of the circumstance.The right should be there for anyone no matter the circustance as No one should be forced to explain why they want it. As in this case the right thing is to think about the ones you allready have first and foremost.On behalf of the mother it is a very selfless act to abort to ensure she is around in the future.

Partnership of nearly 18 Yrs, 1 son 11 yrs, 1 daughter 6 yrs
I am very lucky to still have all this.

Honour thy wife,mother of your children and honour her right to choose.

Copy of photos 600.jpg
 
davidw are arguments are the same I see religion and abortion are arguments I enjoy both of your comments I have brought up in non internet arguments with church nuts haha could use you when I battle the evangical pedophiles again lol
 
greenterra;729890; said:
If you say you are against the right to choose could only mean you have not thought of many scenarios of why abortion may have been needed in the first place.

e.g.your wife and brilliant mother to 2 children already is told if she continues with her pregnancy she has an 80% chance of dying herself.

There are other people to think about here(two already dependant children, a loving husband and family) Those against the right to choose abortion are often misguided or ill informed of the circumstance.The right should be there for anyone no matter the circustance as No one should be forced to explain why they want it. As in this case the right thing is to think about the ones you allready have first and foremost.On behalf of the mother it is a very selfless act to abort to ensure she is around in the future.

Partnership of nearly 18 Yrs, 1 son 11 yrs, 1 daughter 6 yrs
I am very lucky to still have all this.

Honour thy wife,mother of your children and honour her right to choose.

I'm with you, and btw I think you made the only possible choice. I applaud you and your choice:clap
 
started reading..... dcided to skip the crap and give my answer,
i'm all for give the parents a choice, wether it be end the pregnacy or let it go full term and adopt. it should be the PARENTS choice not a politicians (unless they are the parent).

brakken
 
First of all, I don't give a rats ass about religion, the pope, and, yes, paedophile priests and other priests. That is your guys mistake about the issue,. It has nothing to do with religion. This is an ethics issue and has nothing to do with religion.I am totally pro life and I consider that life is the most importnat value of all. Since, where I stand, life begins at the moment of conception, to put an end to it is murder. And that is one of the first problems of the pro abortion people. Call it what it is ( you don't like murder, call it killing, euthanising, whatever ).

Secondly, I repeat that society should spend its resources in teaching people how to avoid undesired pregnancies, not on retroactively "solving" the problem.

Also, a mother who thinks it is her problem , and only her problem is a mother that considers the life in her womb as her chattel, as something one can dispose of. This, in my wiew, is wrong. I would hate to look at my children and be aware that, at one point in their life, I had the right to choose over their right to live or die, like a roman emperor. That demeans the relationship between a parent and a child, because they are, never were, things, over which you could dispose.

Also, that argument about the womans sole right of choice, taking absolutely no account of what the fathers want is one of the most egotistical have ever heard.

And that is the problem, we are in an increasing egotistical society, that growingly adopts a culture of death instead of a culture of life.

Now having said all this, only an insensitive person sees no point in the "serious" pro abortion right arguments. But I still consider that, albeit relevant, very relevant and understandable as they may be, they just stay, even if only one milimetre, below the right of the child to live.

Ad that is why, admittedly bluntly, i keep on calling it murder.

But, please, don't lower the level of the debate and the discussion ( because this issues need debate and discussion ), by mixing in arguments related to where people are from, or to religion.

You us americans should be all too awra of the dangers and stupidity of generalisations of that sort.

just my 2 cents. Let the flaming begin..:chillpill:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
MonsterFishKeepers.com