ALBINO/HYPOMELANISTIC GAR

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Status
Not open for further replies.
waste of a thread really..we are all waiting for pics that don't exist...
 
Perun;3248636; said:
Will you please stop Lieing about what Richard has told you on here.. Both here and in Solomon's Lepisosteid.net post you have misrepresented the truth.

He told you that this fish is very likely a Hypo Atractosteus and not what you presume to be a Hypo or albino Oculatus. He has not said anywhere that you did not see a "white" gar, he has only expressed a skeptical approach to what is at this time not a documented variety within the Slendernosed gar species. Further information and evidence is needed for your claim that it truly is one of the Slendernosed fish and not a Broadnosed.

He is and has directly asked you to prove the fish to get a proper ID and you have essentially thrown a tantrum.


LIER, LIER, WHAT THE F LIER?????????????????????

GEEES, I NEVER THOUGHT ID KNOW WHAT THE OBSERVER OF SOMETHING NEW EVER HAD TO GO THROUGH WAS. IT MIGHT NOT BE THAT NEW OR GREAT A FIND BUT THANKS FOR MAKEING IT CLEAR THAT THERE IS NO REASON TO BRING IT UP HERE.

BY-THE-WAY, I CHECKED ON THE FISH TODAY AFTER RAINS .........
AND ITS STILL THERE. AND I DID GET NEW PHOTOS THOUGH NOW I DONT EVEN WANT TO POST THEM.

THIS IS NOT A TANTRUM ITS DISMAY.
 
You know, a better way to deal with this situation would be to post your pictures, not acting like a baby because they called you out on what they believe is BS unless pics can be provided.

besides I would not mind seeing these pics.
 
moby1%20cropped
http://
 
danseswfish;3256274; said:
LIER, LIER, WHAT THE F LIER?????????????????????

GEEES, I NEVER THOUGHT ID KNOW WHAT THE OBSERVER OF SOMETHING NEW EVER HAD TO GO THROUGH WAS. IT MIGHT NOT BE THAT NEW OR GREAT A FIND BUT THANKS FOR MAKEING IT CLEAR THAT THERE IS NO REASON TO BRING IT UP HERE.

BY-THE-WAY, I CHECKED ON THE FISH TODAY AFTER RAINS .........
AND ITS STILL THERE. AND I DID GET NEW PHOTOS THOUGH NOW I DONT EVEN WANT TO POST THEM.

THIS IS NOT A TANTRUM ITS DISMAY.

3700034246_479a2e522a_o.jpg



3699222483_322b1f70ea_o.jpg
 
danseswfish;3256274; said:
LIER, LIER, WHAT THE F LIER?????????????????????

GEEES, I NEVER THOUGHT ID KNOW WHAT THE OBSERVER OF SOMETHING NEW EVER HAD TO GO THROUGH WAS. IT MIGHT NOT BE THAT NEW OR GREAT A FIND BUT THANKS FOR MAKEING IT CLEAR THAT THERE IS NO REASON TO BRING IT UP HERE.

BY-THE-WAY, I CHECKED ON THE FISH TODAY AFTER RAINS .........
AND ITS STILL THERE. AND I DID GET NEW PHOTOS THOUGH NOW I DONT EVEN WANT TO POST THEM.

THIS IS NOT A TANTRUM ITS DISMAY.

And you claim yourself on another forum as quoted:
"I am a trained marine biologist."

Your a trained Marine Biologist that does not have access to any literature regarding this and you are unaware of how to post a simple photo on a forum. OK sure.

No, I'm sorry but your throwing a tantrum and reducing your credibility and any reason to take you with credibility with each new post.

There is interest for your information and evidence of it but your not going to get far with your current methods and attitude issues. In science you need to expect a level of criticizing language and skepticism for things not yet proven. No one is going to just take you on your word. If you can not handle that without resorting to a mini temper tantrum then you are not a "trained marine biologist".

Admit what you are and act what you are and lets get down to the point which is the fish. Let's see some photos and real proof that will ID this animal.
 
This dudes a doosche an shouldnt be aloud to post anymore.
just kick him out,lol.
This is just sad, no pics...... why??? kuz he has none....
or is so computer illiterate he can't figure out how to post them, lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
MonsterFishKeepers.com