Perun;3248636; said:Will you please stop Lieing about what Richard has told you on here.. Both here and in Solomon's Lepisosteid.net post you have misrepresented the truth.
He told you that this fish is very likely a Hypo Atractosteus and not what you presume to be a Hypo or albino Oculatus. He has not said anywhere that you did not see a "white" gar, he has only expressed a skeptical approach to what is at this time not a documented variety within the Slendernosed gar species. Further information and evidence is needed for your claim that it truly is one of the Slendernosed fish and not a Broadnosed.
He is and has directly asked you to prove the fish to get a proper ID and you have essentially thrown a tantrum.
danseswfish;3256274; said:LIER, LIER, WHAT THE F LIER?????????????????????
GEEES, I NEVER THOUGHT ID KNOW WHAT THE OBSERVER OF SOMETHING NEW EVER HAD TO GO THROUGH WAS. IT MIGHT NOT BE THAT NEW OR GREAT A FIND BUT THANKS FOR MAKEING IT CLEAR THAT THERE IS NO REASON TO BRING IT UP HERE.
BY-THE-WAY, I CHECKED ON THE FISH TODAY AFTER RAINS .........
AND ITS STILL THERE. AND I DID GET NEW PHOTOS THOUGH NOW I DONT EVEN WANT TO POST THEM.
THIS IS NOT A TANTRUM ITS DISMAY.
danseswfish;3256274; said:LIER, LIER, WHAT THE F LIER?????????????????????
GEEES, I NEVER THOUGHT ID KNOW WHAT THE OBSERVER OF SOMETHING NEW EVER HAD TO GO THROUGH WAS. IT MIGHT NOT BE THAT NEW OR GREAT A FIND BUT THANKS FOR MAKEING IT CLEAR THAT THERE IS NO REASON TO BRING IT UP HERE.
BY-THE-WAY, I CHECKED ON THE FISH TODAY AFTER RAINS .........
AND ITS STILL THERE. AND I DID GET NEW PHOTOS THOUGH NOW I DONT EVEN WANT TO POST THEM.
THIS IS NOT A TANTRUM ITS DISMAY.