Honestly, the real discussion here is whether or not dimensional lumber will do as you claim. You stated that using a dimensional lumber stand will cause a tank to fail. This is what you need to prove.
Although it is true that plywood is stronger that dimensional lumber, that doesn't in iteself prove that dimensional lumber will fail. All it proves is that plywood is a bit stronger. No where in the discussion has factual evidence been provided that shows dimensional lumber to;
1. be insuffucient for bulding aquarium stands
2. that the failures you mention were in fact a direct result of the use of dimensional lumber in aquarium stands.
What this discussion then becomes is an argument on which style of stand each person "feels" better about using. Not to even include discussion of proper design techniques for both types of material that would ensure that there is an adequate comparison of the two types.
At this point, without further information, I'm inclined to beleive that what you have on your hands is a coincidence.
+1, you've summed it up pretty good. We can all agree that there is alot of materials out there that are more superior than others, but with all this technical data being introduced into this topic, we're starting to overlook the more relevant facts, that the best material in the world assembled improperly is not as relevant as a properly build one of lesser material. If the original poster is building his plywood stands properly, than I shouldn't discredit it anymore than he should discredit the use of 2x4 lumber. With large DYI stands, it's difficult to truly square it up during it's build process, that's why for me, I level off the stand. Than I level it again with the aquarium on it. I check the level again during my filling process and after. Does that seem excessive? What do I have to lose?
Sent from my LG-P509