Hello; First 100% WC could be hard on the fish. But that aside it is my understanding the bb will survive a while if kept wet. I get that the question is hypothetical and not a practical way to do a WC. It is also my understanding that the source ammonia comes from fish and other animal metabolism plus as a decay byproduct.If I would have used 100% new water (or essentially did a 100% water change) wouldn't that starve the bacteria and cause the nitrogen cycle to start over...or would the bacteria live long enough to not "shock
Hello; I have seen posts about problems with large WC. One take is that if a very large WC is done fairly often, say more than once a week, then issues are avoided.I have read that doing very large % water changes can actually cause some problems.
I suspect the latter.Is the prime/waterchange thing sarcasm or genuine bad advice? Lol
Agreed.Some amount of water change is always welcomed in an aquarium.Matt I have no ideal, hopefully the OP does not follow it.
I do have a question...after the "old tank water" statements I got to thinkning...fish waste = ammonia, bacteria convsumes ammonia and produces nitrites, different bacteria consumes nitrites and produces nitrates, we do water changes and/or incorporate plants to reduce nitrates. If I would have used 100% new water (or essentially did a 100% water change) wouldn't that starve the bacteria and cause the nitrogen cycle to start over...or would the bacteria live long enough to not "shock the system"? I have read that doing very large % water changes can actually cause some problems.