However, if you'll recall I was planning to get or make some new snake cages, and at that point Demetri would have been put in the forty gallon..Ya my brother had one double the size and in a 20 long,nobody said that was too small
However, if you'll recall I was planning to get or make some new snake cages, and at that point Demetri would have been put in the forty gallon..Ya my brother had one double the size and in a 20 long,nobody said that was too small
I honestly don't think walnut husks or whatever they are good substrates. Of all the books, I have read, and of all the information I have seen contradicted, there was silent agreement about walnut husks having a high chance of impaction. And oh, I love sarcastic poking, real mature stuff.
so give the forty gal to me once that happens, problem solvedHowever, if you'll recall I was planning to get or make some new snake cages, and at that point Demetri would have been put in the forty gallon..
he is doing great,gained weight and length i will get pics soonhow is the little guy doing? Any new pics?
Yea. I'm sorry about the husk thing, I was reading your post and forgot entirely about it being a walnut something. Well, in any case, the grain size is a reason for concern. If I can see the individual walnut from your uromastyx picture in the other thread, then it has to be very large indeed. Pet shops recommend nonsense.
I quote one example from this strangely rare product.
http://www.herpcenter.com/product-reviews/substrates-19/zilla-desert-blend-walnut-shells-184/
If you are thinking of rebutting this argument with the substrate label descriptions and pet shops reviews, think again. Almost every pile of junk may be described with similar properties.