VRWC;4448882; said:
I didnt DENY it was a yellowish color, merely stated the males werent as yellow as the females. I just didnt know there were color experts willing to nit pic my statements down to the closest particle color when I made my first blanket statement regarding the differences between the males and females...but thanks for proving my point. That ivory colored male is nowhere near the yellows of females Ive had or were represented in the pics jacob linked to.
Dude, I was
joking. Just trying to lighten the mood a little, lol.
Same dovii six months later, still very golden...
Here is that same fish 1 1/2 years after the original "ivory" pic. Doesn't look very yellow, he's in a dark spot. But when he swims in the sweet spot under the eight 4' T5's, he is in fact still very golden...
Now compare that to the yellowest of yellow of the Parachromis, the female loiselli. This is true yellow...
Now that said, these are my fishes. My dovii is F1 and now well over one foot. When considering color range of a species (in this case dovii), we as collectors have a tiny representation of offspring of maybe three different races whose parents were collected from less than a dozen different locations. This species' territory spans through three countries in Central America along with now well established wild colonies in Florida. This is a giant geographical area. What I'm trying to say is that we as fishkeepers have a relatively TINY representation of all possible variations that exist undiscovered in the wild.
I have seen yellower male dovii than mine here on MFK. But none to approach the true yellow of female loiselli. Female dovii come closer, but still not truly yellow. Descriptions of fishes from retailers are to generate excitement and a willingness to buy their product. Everybody had seen the blue/green/purple dovii that was well established in the hobby. When the newish "yellow" dovii came to market, it did generate a lot of excitement. Its merely clever subterfuge and semantics.
In my opinion, this is all from the wild collectors who just went to a new spot in CA. We have a "new" fish that in reality has always been there, just "undiscovered". Maybe they meet a new guide next year that takes them to a new lagoon where a newly undiscovered race exists. I'd almost bet my tank there's other dovii color variations in the wild. Just like the wildly popular "la ceibas". Considered by Paul Loiselle to be a variant of friedrichsthalii, they are as different from all the freddies I've seen as to almost be another seperate undescribed Parachromis species.
In other words, there are large swaths of undiscovered lakes, lagoons, rivers, and streams containing vast quatities of fishes and variations of fishes we could only dream of seeing. To say there is no yellow dovii in the hobby is one thing. To say they don't exist at all is another. There was a time when the only managuense available was the white/gold/purple. Check out the yellow jags some big names show off here from time to time. As much as the innnernetzz has made the world smaller, we haven't even begun to discover what's out there in these jungles..
Now, of course, all of that jibber jabber is way off topic. So to get back on track, I still say the fishes in the original pic are jag x loiselli.
