Atlas of Creation by Harun Yahya
- Thread starter mercury904
- Start date
umm modest check this link from the University of Oregon
http://zebu.uoregon.edu/~soper/Orbits/newtongrav.html
It's about the law of gravity.
There are also other laws. They are out there if you look.
Law of Conservation of Matter
Law of Conservation of Energy
Boyle's Law
Avogadro's Law
http://zebu.uoregon.edu/~soper/Orbits/newtongrav.html
It's about the law of gravity.
There are also other laws. They are out there if you look.
Law of Conservation of Matter
Law of Conservation of Energy
Boyle's Law
Avogadro's Law
The ONLY scientific discipline with "Laws" is Physics.
We are having a discussion about Biology.
We are having a discussion about Biology.
You're not even reading what I'm posting. If gravity is a Law how come the expansion of the universe is speeding up? Why do stars on the outskirts move faster than predicted using the "Law" of gravity? So far "dark matter" is to blame which doesn't follow the 'Universal Law of Gravity'. Eventually the "law" of gravity is going to have to be changed to answer these discrepancies. Which makes it a theory. It's called Gravitational Theory for a reason.
I'm not disputing gravity or any such nonsense, but to call it a law (absolute) is ludicrous.
I'm a biologist, not a physicist.
I'm not disputing gravity or any such nonsense, but to call it a law (absolute) is ludicrous.
I'm a biologist, not a physicist.
After reading up a little on the "Atlas of creation" on this site -http://www.harunyahya.com/books/darwinism/atlas_creation/atlas_creation_03a.php
I don't think i will rush out to buy but it has been very interesting reading on this thread .
I don't think i will rush out to buy but it has been very interesting reading on this thread .
The original argument that I am disputing is that only physics has laws.
The original debate between cohazard and myself was good but now things are getting outside the realm.
Another case in point.... "The most fundamental concept in chemistry is the law of conservation of mass"
The original debate between cohazard and myself was good but now things are getting outside the realm.
Another case in point.... "The most fundamental concept in chemistry is the law of conservation of mass"
You realize we were talking about evolution from a single cell right? I am not going to debate tit for tat stuff with you. the original argument came to an agree to disagree standpoint. You say there are only laws in physics yet I can look up laws in other scientific fields on university websites on the internet. Do I believe them or you?? I'll debate with someone who wants to debate but I find most of your comments to deviate from context. I will not argue with you about this. Don't take this as a sign of you "winning" an argument as you will do anyway, but I choose not to argue with you in particular. No offense, it's just not my style of debate. Neither you nor I could argue with the people that wrote a lot of the information that we have used in this thread. I'd rather debate about the original topic but even that has run it's course.
Avogadro was a chemist.
Avogadro's Law (Avogadro's theory; Avogadro's hypothesis) is a principle stated in 1811 by the Italian chemist Amedeo Avogadro (1776-1856) that "equal volumes of gases at the same temperature and pressure contain the same number of molecules regardless of their chemical nature and physical properties". This number (Avogadro's number) is 6.023 X 1023. It is the number of molecules of any gas present in a volume of 22.41 L and is the same for the lightest gas (hydrogen) as for a heavy gas such as carbon dioxide or bromine.
ref cit http://www.chemistry.co.nz/avogadro.htm
Avogadro was a chemist.
Avogadro's Law (Avogadro's theory; Avogadro's hypothesis) is a principle stated in 1811 by the Italian chemist Amedeo Avogadro (1776-1856) that "equal volumes of gases at the same temperature and pressure contain the same number of molecules regardless of their chemical nature and physical properties". This number (Avogadro's number) is 6.023 X 1023. It is the number of molecules of any gas present in a volume of 22.41 L and is the same for the lightest gas (hydrogen) as for a heavy gas such as carbon dioxide or bromine.
ref cit http://www.chemistry.co.nz/avogadro.htm
Evolution of complex life from single cells:
The immediate, single-celled precursors of Animalia are known as the Choanoflagellates. They are single-celled organisms with a single, rear flagella, placing them in the family of amoeba, choanoflagellata, and animalia (Opisthokontos).
Single-celled choanoflagellates will often lump together into circular colonies that are identical to the formations of choanocytes in the first and most primitive animals, sponges.
A corresponding bridge between single-celled and metazoan life in plants can be found in the genus Volvox, where a bikont (double-flagellate) photosynthetic protist forms into reproductive colonies resembling large spheres, which reproduce smaller forms of the colony within themselves, until the new colonies burst the old one from the inside out. They can also reproduce asexually, the old fashioned way.
The immediate, single-celled precursors of Animalia are known as the Choanoflagellates. They are single-celled organisms with a single, rear flagella, placing them in the family of amoeba, choanoflagellata, and animalia (Opisthokontos).
Single-celled choanoflagellates will often lump together into circular colonies that are identical to the formations of choanocytes in the first and most primitive animals, sponges.
A corresponding bridge between single-celled and metazoan life in plants can be found in the genus Volvox, where a bikont (double-flagellate) photosynthetic protist forms into reproductive colonies resembling large spheres, which reproduce smaller forms of the colony within themselves, until the new colonies burst the old one from the inside out. They can also reproduce asexually, the old fashioned way.
