Battery operated vacuum.

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Have the ehiem quick vac. Works well for me. More than 1/2 way decent.
 
I find these battery operated vacs to be useless, even if you chop up turds with the edge, your only sucking up chunks, but leaving the most deleterious stuff behind.
If you are going to take the time vac, why not change some water at the same time, although turds are aesthetically obnoxious, its the invisible chemical toxins in the water columnthat are the real matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Far2lively
Why not use a plain fish net? That’s what I do and it works better than my python.
 
Has anyone come across a battery operated (or 110V) vacuum that works half way decent?

Flowerhorn turds are bigger than what I was anticipating!
I never understand why people waste their money on these things. I use a 5/8 vinyl tube to vacuum and do water changes on my old 300g system. I kept Rays that poop crap bigger than your flower horn and that tube sucked it up like a boba through a straw.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zanzag
Yup, yup, yup. This all makes sense to me. I can't imagine a little battery powered motor being strong enough to suck up what I need.

knot4te: thanks for the feedback. I've looked at these also but just couldn't bring myself to pull the trigger...............

BUT..............fishhead0103666: I don't know why I hadn't thought of that. That sounds about the easiest way to address daily maintenance. DUH! Heck, I would need to clean the poop out of the battery operated vacuum anyway, it's even easier to clean out a net.

Duane: I agree. I just don't want to haul out my python and cover the wood floor every day to remove some eyesores.
 
I have a different opinion with regards to aquarium vacuums: I use these cheap battery operated ones by Jeneca (1 on each of 3 tanks; fourth is too deep) -- they work a charm, keep my bare bottom tanks nearly immaculate, save me time, and I don't have to suck on any siphons or use bigger buckets (just 6 liter water bottles for each tank).

And the waste is removed pretty much completely (unlike using a net, where about 1/3 at least disintegrates and goes back into your tank (and by then is too small to net again). I also find my Kamfa attacks the vacuum less than nets, which makes netting waste hard when you're trying to avoid an aggro fish or he's pushing the net around. Another fish might be different though.

Anyway if you do this every day (takes 5 min. or less) before the waste starts to decompose too much, then the impact on water chemistry is in fact very minimal -- my nitrates rarely go over 15 (and out of tap it's already about 8) with weekly 40-50% water changes. On one tank (Flowerhorn) I re-fill with an equal amount of water every time I take out (Arowanas don't like me pouring water into their tanks that way and try to snap at it too much), so his water stays pretty darn clean, as do all his tank's filters.

Jeneca Battery Aquarium Cleaner.jpg

I've never used the Eheim vac, I'm sure it's way better quality/durability than these, Chinese-made Jenecas, which only cost about $11 usd here (plus batteries of course; they come with a DC plug but I don't consider it overly safe lol). I also don't use the little filter sock (some waste will sift through and escape back into the tank), just the hose going straight into an empty water bottle, easy peasy.

Btw, that little motor has enough power to easily draw waste from my 28" high Arowana tanks, let alone my 22" high (115g) Kamfa tank.

Using these, this is what my canister filter looks like when I opened it to clean yesterday, first time in 7 months (granted it's only 1 X 15" Arowana in a 325 but he eats like a horse, gets fed daily and lays some big ones). The foam and bio-media were clean as anything and the water in the canister is as clear as some people's tanks:

SunSun 704a after 7 months.jpg

Nothing wrong with just using a hose/siphon/bucket, but I personally find these much easier, esp. if doing on a daily basis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RD.
I had one years ago, and I agree with Barrett. DO NOT use if you have deep sand or gravel bottom tanks, agreed, they will not suck deep substrate well, but .............. for a bare bottom tank very easy peasy, and has enough juice to get the job done nicely. By the time Diok's has his hose hooked up to the sink, a bare bottomed tank is already clean.

And I agree, FH turds are a joke compared to a rays. lol
 
Hmmmmm.......more to think about.

I DO use PFS for substrate.

Kon4te: what substrate are you using?
Thin layer of sand.
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com