Bead Filters and Pump Sizing

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Status
Not open for further replies.
Happy New Year!

It's hard for a person whose experience is only from cut-and-paste color pictures to understand. Why don't you try a hand-on experience? Go to Home Depot, buy a 10-ft section of 1" pipe and 2" pipe. Take your pump and a full 5-gal bucket to your lawn. Shoot water thru each pipe and record the different height and different time the water comes out the top. Do that, then we talk, D-az Boy!

You are arguing against the laws of fluid dynamics so I'm not going to waste my time with your backyard experiment. Instead, I'll share some info from one of the largest pump manufacturers in the hobby.

Taken from Reeflo's "Tips and Troubleshooting" PDF:http://www.reeflopumps.com/images/tips.pdf

There are two elements that cause pressure requirements in your system; vertical lift and
“FRICTION LOSS”. Simply stated it is the pressure created by trying to squeeze large flows
through a narrow opening (think bar straw). There are two important aspects 1) It matters the
length of the narrow line (1” bar straw vs. 10” bar straw) and 2) Friction loss increases at an
increasing rate when either flow is increased or pipe is narrowed. The narrower the line the more
the pump has to work (think clogged ateries and your heart).

Minimize friction losses by using large diameter pipe. First determine the approximate flow rate
you want, and the total length of your pipe. The Friction Loss chart will allow you determine the
amount of extra “head pressure” will be added to your systemdue to the diameter of your piping.
(The size of the pump’s suction and discharge ports does not indicate your proper pipe size.)
Choose a pipe diameter that keeps your friction loss below about five feet per hundred feet of
pipe. Even if you have a section of small diameter pipe that you can’t change, as with a through
the wall fitting, it is still beneficial to use larger pipe on the majority of the run. It matters how much
wide pipe you use. Friction loss chart- The narrowness of the pipe increases friction loss in a
geometric manner.EXAMPLE: At 2700 gph using 1.5” instead of 1” pipe reduces friction loss from
97.75’ per 100’ to 11.73’ per 100’. A big reduction in “head pressure”
Friction Loss Per 100 Feet .

Is Reeflo giving out bad info, or is it possible you are wrong?

You're the one who lacks of common sense. If you want to see water on the return end, whether it's 15', 20' or 100' head, of course you need to get a pump that can handle such head pressure. That's why I posted that he needs a pump that produces 2000gph @ 10' head and whatever desires gph at 20-ft head. It doesn't mean he must use a pump that produces 2000gph @ 20' head. You're the one who needs to calm down and start reading.

I think what's tripping you up is that you are stuck on the recommended performance of the pump @ 10' of head. Focus on the GPH through the filter at the system's total head...the 2,000GPH @ 10' figure is irrelevant unless it's a system with roughly 10' of head.
 
Happy New Year!

You are arguing against the laws of fluid dynamics so I'm not going to waste my time with your backyard experiment. Instead, I'll share some info from one of the largest pump manufacturers in the hobby.

Taken from Reeflo's "Tips and Troubleshooting" PDF:http://www.reeflopumps.com/images/tips.pdf

Is Reeflo giving out bad info, or is it possible you are wrong?

I think what's tripping you up is that you are stuck on the recommended performance of the pump @ 10' of head. Focus on the GPH through the filter at the system's total head...the 2,000GPH @ 10' figure is irrelevant unless it's a system with roughly 10' of head.
Happy New Year!

You used Reeflo information as backup for your internal pump shows that you lacks of knowledge. Most internal pump (I said most, because I haven't used all the internal pumps available in the market) are not pressure pump, not like Reeflo or many other external pump. They move fluid, but put little to no pressure. They can't handle pressure either. If you use smaller pipe than it was designed, it will put pressure on the pump, heat it up, break the shaft, bust the impeller magnet, or deform the casing. If you use bigger pipe than it was design, the pump need to fill the cross area before moving the fluid upward, and that take a little longer than it was design, thus the gph at designed head reduce. That's the reason why your pump manufacturer put such note.

You're think the 2000 gph @ 10' is irrelevant, because you have no clue about an Ultima filter. While it was not shown in those fancy charts/pictures that were posted, it's in the manual that you must not put your pump more than 3' from the filter.

http://www.fallingwaterdesigns.com/html/manuals/Instructions Ultima II 01-26-06 V1.pdf

Now, do you have any idea why the 2000 gph @ 10' head is important? Ultima couldn't careless on how many total feet your system is. They just want to make sure that you give the 2000 model 2000 gph (4000gph for the 4000 model and so on...) when the water enters the chamber so that there is enough flow to tumble the media bead. You think the filter won't work with a pump with 0 gph at 15' in a system of 20' head total. That's so wrong! As long as the pump produces 2000 gph @ 10' head, the water will exit the filter. The pump may produce 0gph at 15', but as long as the pump and the pipe can handle the back pressure, eventually, water will come out of the other end, from the pipe being filled. Water got to come out somewhere, whether the pipe was busted, the pump was fried, or take hours before the pipe was filled and water dripping out of the outlet. Being used in aquarium, I hardly think why a system end up with 20' head, unless you run a filter in the garage to an aquarium in the living room.

You like to reply with fancy charts, color pictures, big words, because you lack of actual knowlege. With the way you put together the sump like the one you're using, you have more to learn than to share. It's very irresponsible to share when you're clueless, because you're playing "expert" at other's expense. If you want to play expert, do it at your expense.
 
I like talking about this stuff, so here goes...

Happy New Year!

You used Reeflo information as backup for your internal pump shows that you lacks of knowledge. Most internal pump (I said most, because I haven't used all the internal pumps available in the market) are not pressure pump, not like Reeflo or many other external pump. They move fluid, but put little to no pressure. They can't handle pressure either. If you use smaller pipe than it was designed, it will put pressure on the pump, heat it up, break the shaft, bust the impeller magnet, or deform the casing.

"Head" and "Pressure" are essentially the same things expressed in different terms. The pump, whether it's a mag style (like a Laguna) or direct drive centrifugal pump (like a Reeflo) will provide the specified flow at the specified head or pressure.

Here is the formula to convert head to PSI:

Head to PSI.png

In this example, lets convert 10' of head to PSI.
(10' x 1) / 2.31 = 4.329PSI.

10' head = 4.329PSI

...so to say they can't handle pressure is incorrect; it's a matter of how much pressure they can handle. The Max Flo 4200 can do ~2,000GPH at 4.329PSI (which is also the same as 10' head).

If you are saying that the Max Flo is not a high head or high pressure pump, I agree. For the larger model Ultimas, you would definitely want to use a direct drive pump, but the Laguna Max Flo 4200 meets the specs required to run a Ultima 2000 (2,000GPH @ 10' of head), so using this pump will suffice (unless your system has a bit more than 10' total head).

The correct question to ask is, how much pressure does the pump need to overcome while still pushing the desired GPH through the system?

If someone can provide a clear explanation as to why a direct drive pump pushing 2000GPH at 10' (or 4.329PSI) is any different from a mag drive style pump pushing 2,000GPH @ 10' feet (or 4.329PSI), I would love to hear it...the filters sure can't tell the difference.

If you use bigger pipe than it was design, the pump need to fill the cross area before moving the fluid upward, and that take a little longer than it was design, thus the gph at designed head reduce. That's the reason why your pump manufacturer put such note.

This is false. The amount of fluid moving vertically will be the same if not more, due to the reduction in friction loss by using larger pipe. You are misinterpretting Laguna's note.

You're think the 2000 gph @ 10' is irrelevant, because you have no clue about an Ultima filter. While it was not shown in those fancy charts/pictures that were posted, it's in the manual that you must not put your pump more than 3' from the filter.

Who mentioned placing the filter more than 3' from the pump? It's the plumbing after the filter that I am referring to.

I called Aqua UV and they referred me to Lee at Performance Pro Pumps to help me size a pump to a system where 2,000GPH is desired @20' of head (awesome guy BTW...very helpful and knows his stuff when it comes to pumps). He mentioned that you would actually want to account for 10' of head through the Ultima (as opposed to the 3' to 8' that Ultima mentioned in their FAQ). If you go by his suggestion over Aqua UV's, this pretty much disqualifies the Laguna for running the unit if you have it plumbing into your sump...it also means you would need to buy a direct drive pump, which they happen to specialize in. :naughty: Although if Peter plumbs the Laguna and Ultima as a closed loop and places the Laguna in his sump it would likely work very well and he would get the added benefit of the heat the pump puts into his system (assuming he could use the extra heat).

Lee confirmed what I have been saying; the pump needs to be sized to the entire system. On a system with 20' of head, where you want 2,000GPH running through the Ultima 2000, he recommended a pump that does 33 gallons per minute (aka- 1,980GPH) @ 20' of head. What the pump does @ 10' of head is irrelevant.

I am interest in this because I have a spare Max Flo 4200 and I had considered adding a Ultima to my system.

Now, do you have any idea why the 2000 gph @ 10' head is important? Ultima couldn't careless on how many total feet your system is. They just want to make sure that you give the 2000 model 2000 gph (4000gph for the 4000 model and so on...) when the water enters the chamber so that there is enough flow to tumble the media bead. You think the filter won't work with a pump with 0 gph at 15' in a system of 20' head total. That's so wrong! As long as the pump produces 2000 gph @ 10' head, the water will exit the filter. The pump may produce 0gph at 15', but as long as the pump and the pipe can handle the back pressure, eventually, water will come out of the other end, from the pipe being filled. Water got to come out somewhere, whether the pipe was busted, the pump was fried, or take hours before the pipe was filled and water dripping out of the outlet. Being used in aquarium, I hardly think why a system end up with 20' head, unless you run a filter in the garage to an aquarium in the living room.

I don't "THINK" that a pump with 0 gph at 15' in a system of 20' head total will not work....I KNOW it will not work.

The definition of Max Shut-off head is the highest point the pump will lift liquid. At this point the pump will pump 0 gallons per minute, per hour, per month, per year. Take a step back and think about it.

Water will not "eventually...come out of the other end" at any point beyond the pump's shut-off head. Your Ultima will not work unless water is circulating through your system; a pump with a max shut-off of 15' will be moving no water whatsoever through a system with 20' of head.

At 15' of head or at a pressure of 6.494PSI [(15 x 1) /2.31 = 6.494], this pump will not circulate any water.

A system with 20' of head is not unheard of. In the other thread where the dude is running a Ultima 4000, he was also running a sand filter and another unit with 40lbs of charcoal. The Ultima adds on average 5' of head, the sand filter would likely add quite a bit more than that, say 8' and the charcoal another 6'. That's a total of 19' of head before we even get to adding the vertical distance the water needs to be pumped and any friction loss from plumbing/fittings.

You like to reply with fancy charts, color pictures, big words, because you lack of actual knowlege. With the way you put together the sump like the one you're using, you have more to learn than to share. It's very irresponsible to share when you're clueless, because you're playing "expert" at other's expense. If you want to play expert, do it at your expense.

lol- you crack me up John. The charts I am posting are known facts established by those in the field of physics/fluid dynamics. It's a mathematical certainty...look up the Darcy-Weisbach formula; Δp = λ (l / dh) (ρ v2 / 2) (1)

Fiat Lux

PS- Why do you always bring up my filter? You love my filter long time? ;)

Head to PSI.png
 
It takes you all kind of math, theory, number and two phone calls just to figure that out, when everything is stated in the manual or website from the manufacturer

For Peter's case, he wants to add an Ultima 2000 and asked whether the Max Flo 4200 is suffice. My answer was "No," point to the optimal flow recommended by manufacturer is 2000gph @ 10'. You threw in 20' head system and all kind of irrelevant rubbish, and said manufacturer recommendation was irrelevant. Like I said, Ultima recommends the optimal 2000gph @ 10', because that's what the filter was designed. They want to make sure you give the filter 2000gph of water when it enter the chamber to tumble the media. They don't care of your system total head, and that's why they refer you to the pump manufacturer. Think for a second! If a pump produces 2000gph at 20', what's the flow at 10' or what's the max flow? Look at the picture Peter attached from Ultima. They also recommended min flow 2000gph and max flow 4000gph pump, in case someone who wants to save a buck and don't mind to operate the filter under optimal condition, they can use a 2000gph pump. I don't need to google up any pump, but I can tell you for a certain that if a pump produces 2000gph at 20', it also produces more 4000gph flow than manufacturer recommendation. Do you know why Ultima recommends 4000gph max for Ultima 2000? The parts are plastic. The media is plastic. If you run a pump stronger than 4000gph, there's a great chance you blew out the parts, smash the media, and blew the seal. I brought up the 3', because if you read Peter's first post, he mentioned that the Ultima will be next to his stand. For a 180gal sump (assuming 6x2) in a 600gal tank stand (assuming 8x4), with a submersible pump that is inside the sump, all the lateral distance between the pump and the Ultima will be more than 3-ft. I don't know if that's common sense or engineer stuff. I just have a 600gal with an approximately 180gal sump (72x28x22) so it's not too hard for me to picture it. Also, unless Peter want to run the pive 5 times around his 600gal tank, I don't see how could he get 20' head with an Ultima next to his stand?

You mention "the other dude" setup is also irrelevant. He has an Ultima 4000, with optimal flow of 4000gph @ 10' head, min flow 2000gph, max flow 4500gph. A quick look at Reeflo will show you that 4500gph will NOT shutdown at 20' head. It may not give "the other dude" the flow he desires, but that's, again, is not Ultima concern. It's "the other dude" concern. He either have to install the Ultima seperately, or get a bigger Ultima, because if he plans to use a pump with 2000gph @ 20' head, there's a great chance he'll total his Ultima.

You like to complicate thing up, when it's as simple as follow the manufacturer instruction. I'm sure Ultima has engineers who use Fluid dynamic or Hydraulic design to come up with such recommendation. I'm sure after all the calculation, they figure with the vertical height difference between pump and inlet port, the max 3' distance between pump and filter, and all friction loss thru those parts inside the filter, plus some common sense that not many will pump a filter in the basement to a tank in 2nd floor, or a filter in the garage thru a couple of rooms to get to a tank to come up with the optimal flow @ 10' head. They don't just pull those number out of thin air.
 
If someone can provide a clear explanation as to why a direct drive pump pushing 2000GPH at 10' (or 4.329PSI) is any different from a mag drive style pump pushing 2,000GPH @ 10' feet (or 4.329PSI), I would love to hear it...the filters sure can't tell the difference.
The difference is a mag drive style pump only produce 1908gph or 1968gph @ 10' head in a perfect condition, so with a couple 90 elbows, a chunk of media, the filters sure can't tell the difference, someone can't tell the difference, but to me, it doesn't look like the optimal flow 2000 gph @ 10' head recommended by Ultima.
 
It takes you all kind of math, theory, number and two phone calls just to figure that out, when everything is stated in the manual or website from the manufacturer

For Peter's case, he wants to add an Ultima 2000 and asked whether the Max Flo 4200 is suffice. My answer was "No," point to the optimal flow recommended by manufacturer is 2000gph @ 10'. You threw in 20' head system and all kind of irrelevant rubbish, and said manufacturer recommendation was irrelevant. Like I said, Ultima recommends the optimal 2000gph @ 10', because that's what the filter was designed. They want to make sure you give the filter 2000gph of water when it enter the chamber to tumble the media. They don't care of your system total head, and that's why they refer you to the pump manufacturer. Think for a second! If a pump produces 2000gph at 20', what's the flow at 10' or what's the max flow? Look at the picture Peter attached from Ultima. They also recommended min flow 2000gph and max flow 4000gph pump, in case someone who wants to save a buck and don't mind to operate the filter under optimal condition, they can use a 2000gph pump. I don't need to google up any pump, but I can tell you for a certain that if a pump produces 2000gph at 20', it also produces more 4000gph flow than manufacturer recommendation. Do you know why Ultima recommends 4000gph max for Ultima 2000? The parts are plastic. The media is plastic. If you run a pump stronger than 4000gph, there's a great chance you blew out the parts, smash the media, and blew the seal. I brought up the 3', because if you read Peter's first post, he mentioned that the Ultima will be next to his stand. For a 180gal sump (assuming 6x2) in a 600gal tank stand (assuming 8x4), with a submersible pump that is inside the sump, all the lateral distance between the pump and the Ultima will be more than 3-ft. I don't know if that's common sense or engineer stuff. I just have a 600gal with an approximately 180gal sump (72x28x22) so it's not too hard for me to picture it. Also, unless Peter want to run the pive 5 times around his 600gal tank, I don't see how could he get 20' head with an Ultima next to his stand?

You mention "the other dude" setup is also irrelevant. He has an Ultima 4000, with optimal flow of 4000gph @ 10' head, min flow 2000gph, max flow 4500gph. A quick look at Reeflo will show you that 4500gph will NOT shutdown at 20' head. It may not give "the other dude" the flow he desires, but that's, again, is not Ultima concern. It's "the other dude" concern. He either have to install the Ultima seperately, or get a bigger Ultima, because if he plans to use a pump with 2000gph @ 20' head, there's a great chance he'll total his Ultima.

You like to complicate thing up, when it's as simple as follow the manufacturer instruction. I'm sure Ultima has engineers who use Fluid dynamic or Hydraulic design to come up with such recommendation. I'm sure after all the calculation, they figure with the vertical height difference between pump and inlet port, the max 3' distance between pump and filter, and all friction loss thru those parts inside the filter, plus some common sense that not many will pump a filter in the basement to a tank in 2nd floor, or a filter in the garage thru a couple of rooms to get to a tank to come up with the optimal flow @ 10' head. They don't just pull those number out of thin air.

Two simple questions that could resolve all of this. Yes or no answers please:

1. Is the flow at the inlet to the Ultima different from the flow at the point where water is returned back into the tank?

2. In a system with 20' of total head, do you think a pump that pushes 2,000GPH @ 20' of head is pumping more than 2,000GPH through the Ultima?

:popcorn:
 
Seriously... people need to chill out.

aldiaz23 is suggesting a pump based on the manufacturers recommendation of filter effectiveness. No more, no less.

jlnguyen is suggesting that a person may want more that what the box states.

I think that about sums it up. If I'm wrong and need to make a correction to my statement or an additional clarification, please PM.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
MonsterFishKeepers.com