And exactly what portion of that article was supposed to support your stance in this debate, David? That one
must use a shotgun approach to feeding, so that if one food fails in one area, another will cover that loss?
And would that be part of this
scientific research that you speak of?
Yes indeed, very
scientific.
please provide any link to a full nutritional breakdown of any pellet foods that even come close to the detail in the link to shrimp that I provided.
Most fish food manufacturers won't typically divulge this kind of data (beyond what is required by law on a label) as it falls under the umbrella of propritary information. The manufacturing of pet food is a multi-billion dollar industry, so it should stand to reason why I can't lay all of this data out on a silver platter for you. It's one of those, I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you, situations.
Perhaps you can provide a full nutritional breakdown of what
you feed via your shotgun feeding method? Do you even know what the level of Vitamin C is in any daily feeding that you provide your fish? Surely you must have detailed records on all of these nutrient levels that you can provide for the members here, yes?
I can't speak on behalf of all pellet food manufacturers, but regarding the one that I feed, and have been feeding for the past decade or so, I have seen the nutritional analysis performed by a non-biased 3rd party accredited institution, overseen by those who are considered experts regarding the science of fish nutrition. The information was gathered & published without any knowledge by the manufacturer. (he simply supplied 1 of the foods used in the study) But even if I posted a link to this data short of it being on company letterhead, and witnessed & vetted by the President of the United States himself, it wouldn't prove anything to someone like yourself, would it?
I mean according to you there musn't be a single aquaculture facility in the world that understands the basic principles of fish nutrition, and how all of the nutrients in pellet food are destroyed during the manufacturing process. I mean after all;
"the problem with all prepared foods is that they are stuffed with filler, cooked at extreme temperatures and UV sterilized, both of which destroy vitamins, minerals and amino acids. ".
Right?
You might want to explain that to all of the multi-million dollar commercial salmon, trout, sturgeon, catfish etc operations that feed pellet food. When one considers that sturgeon caviar can fetch $1,000+ per pound, I'm sure that they would probably be interested in hearing your opinion on all of this.
Funny stuff.