csx4236;2394087; said:
Yes they have captured and studied both. For instance leo and henlei have different size teeth so thats a specific way to tell them apart. Leo are large teeth and henlei smaller teeth. If BD and leo were different they would have seen the differences when the rays were disected and studied. Mouth size, teeth size or bone structure etc.
the problem is science is not concrete., but is changing everyday. what use to define species may not apply in all cases. humans for instance, black and white, different skin color, height, proportions, from different climate, different parts of the world, different diet, different habits, some cannibals, and some vegetarians, but still the same species. If any other animal with that many variations, would defintely considered as a new species.
there are clumpers and spliters, the cichlid people tend to split the things with the most minute differences, like cyphotilapia frontosa and gibberosa, almost identical, just slight variations.
so are the ray communities clumpers or splitter?
as far as the teeth being bigger or smaller, i feel that through Darwin's theory, they will adapt over time to best suit their local diet or needs. Like common carp, cyprinus carpio, the ones in the lakes that lake predators tend to grow long and slender, where there are predators like pikes (esox), they grow tall and deep bodied to avoid predation, still the same species.
also think Dalmation...Leopoldi, bd, henlei
people, some are fat, tall, skinny, short, slant eyed, big eyed, etc...