Blue dragon?
- Thread starter ghostrebo
- Start date
How you know about the family and bloodline history of OP's fish?
I can get a lot of fish similar to that White tiger there and say the same nonsense.
for me I already know . But for yourself, now you should know that your arse is flaming BS haha
In all seriousness, gamer, you really should spend more time listening to some of the more experienced members. They are just trying to help, and it can get a bit frustrating at times when people with no real clue are posting things as hard facts. Just some food for thought .....
Ok i gave a specific guess to the question who else here searched for the strain closest to the ops fish they could find rather than to just tell him its just a insignificant cross or express their irrelevant pet peeves or statements towards other members i give up seems trying to post anyhing that makes a little since to the objective of the thread just starts a troll war
Sent from my SM-T210R using MonsterAquariaNetwork App
Sent from my SM-T210R using MonsterAquariaNetwork App
Nobody said it was an insignificant cross, it's an awesome fish. Looking at pictures of actual named strains and automatically calling a fish this or that is a good way to make the forum inaccurate and ridiculous. The fact is there have been many breeds that have came and gone and the goners are gone forever, left behind in favor of breeding the srd's and kamfas of today. It's part of the evolution of flowerhorn. If you wanted to breed for forked fins and super red color and name a strain flaming ass dragons it would be a very noble effort.
Insignificant cross? Clearly nobody suggested that, it is indeed a great looking specimen.
And I wholeheartily agree with what AA stated with regards to making the forum appear inaccurate and ridiculous. This has been an ongoing issue in the FH folder here on MFK since its inception. A lot of stupid talk by inexperienced FH guru wannabes.
And I wholeheartily agree with what AA stated with regards to making the forum appear inaccurate and ridiculous. This has been an ongoing issue in the FH folder here on MFK since its inception. A lot of stupid talk by inexperienced FH guru wannabes.
Apparently yall took insignificant out of context and ran with it let me be clear on this when i say insignificant cross i mean thai cross or zz cross is meaningless its too vague its only saying its a cross of a type of flowhorn not a strain in no way shape or form did i mean anyone was dogging on the op's fh
Sent from my SM-T210R using MonsterAquariaNetwork App
Sent from my SM-T210R using MonsterAquariaNetwork App
it's getting dumb in here. So take off all your clothes.
*Girl sings*
it is
get n.
so dumb.
I wanna take
my clothes off.
---------------------------------
So it is whatever you know of deserves a name, if you don't kow it, it doesnt. So just whatever is made popular into you own mind..
It is so unfair to every FH.
None of the old names mean anything to me personally, except as a reference point. None of the breeders that created them will reveal how they did it, so who cares? I am creating my own crosses, using purebred fish, I highly doubt I am following the exact recipe used by the original breeders of any named strain. Two different breeders, using slightly different combinations of fish, could produce virtually identical offspring. But that doesn't mean those offspring are the same strain. So regardless of what my fish end up looking like, I will not be naming them with the old/traditional names. I intend to call them exactly what they are. Syn X parrot X Texas for example... I also intend to tell anybody who will listen exactly how I made them. Unlike the original creators of all the fh strains. The hobby has moved on now, it doesn't just belong to any one country, any one person. So why should I bother using the names & methodology of someone else, when I have my own ideas of what is right? Especially when I think they sacrificed health & vigor, for beauty, in so many strains? I will call my fish exactly what they are. It's my strain, so that means I get to name it, just like every other breeder who created a strain. I will call them by every species name they carry in their genetics. And if I catch anyone on the Internet calling my fish RBK's etc. I will quickly school them. My strain, my name. Simple descriptive names are acceptable to me, red Texas, red syn etc. As long as the word hybrid was also used in that name. "Hybrid red syn" for example. Understand that I'm only holding myself, and my own strains, to this standard. The rest of you can flame each other over these outdated, possibly mistranslated, irrelevant, names, till the end of time for all I care.
So who cares? Obviously the OP, or he wouldn't have asked.
There's nothing wrong with people asking, or with using older traditional names when the fish fits the name. And Izzy, when you have a strain of fish that breeds true & looks like the OP's fish make sure to post pics.
There's nothing wrong with people asking, or with using older traditional names when the fish fits the name. And Izzy, when you have a strain of fish that breeds true & looks like the OP's fish make sure to post pics.
