cchhcc;3607812; said:
DC and hybrid talk goes hand in hand ... and it is not unfounded...he considers pond raised fish as "wild" ... and and his ponds can get rogue fish in them at times. Right now he is labelling some of his fish as hybrids (that's a big step forward IMO). The Paratheraps and Viejas are the most likely to be hybridized, but he supplies so many people that it's tough to know just how much of that is Don and how much is further down the line.
Hard to say what part of that is total nonsense and what part an attempt at outright slur or worse.
1) You are claiming, cchcc, long before I ever entered this thread, that Don Conkel "considers pond raised fish as 'wild.'"
a) Either you can offer factual proof of that, or, as usual, are merely regurgitating something you "heard" or "read" (likely
misread) somewhere, or perhaps habitually invent/imagine things - quite a few things, actually, "unfounded."
b) Apparently you're unable to distinguish between "bred" and "raised." Whether or not that's sloppiness or intentional stupidity remains to be seen.
c) I think that the casual observer might easily conclude that what you claim, if blatantly untrue (which it is) constitutes libel or feigned ignorance or both.
2) You are also claiming, again, before I uttered word one, that "Right now he [Don Conkel] is labelling some of his fish as hybrids (that's a big step forward IMO)."
a) Don Conkel isn't "labeling some of his fish as hybrids," unless half-truth is your normal way of expressing yourself, which it frequently (if not always) appears to be.
b) Those fish that
are DCT hybrids ("labeled" as such) are precisely two in number: calobrensis x grammodes, and loisellei x Chairel carpintis.
c) So when you infer for yourself and insinuate to others that DCT "Paratheraps and Viejas are the most likely to be hybridized," your upchuck coalesces into putrid innuendo. You have nothing firsthand whatsoever, nothing but hearsay or slander to back your insinuations on. Or DO you?
3) By your adding "it's tough to know just how much of that is Don and how much is further down the line,"in professing your own ignorance, you attempt to weasel out of being held accountable for your slurs.
4) In claiming "his [Don Conkel's] ponds can get rogue fish in them at times," what evidence have you of that? Cite an example. At least one. More if you can. Have you seen Don's ponds? About how many yards between them? About how many feet high are the embankments? "
Rogue fish?" What do you mean by that?
Specifically what "rogue fish"?? Be
specific else swallow it.
"Outrage" isn't quite what's going on.
It's outright lies and sleazy innuendos that tend to irritate, including myself and others. Opinions I could care less about. cchcc, whomever or whatever else you may happen to be, in case it escaped notice, opinions are just like a holes: everybody has one, and you're free to share yours with whomever you please. When it comes to prejudices - unlike someone who
claims patronage to DCT - "Prejudices." Hm. You're the expert on that. As per "I [cchcc] will continue to acquire livestock from DCT," I'd be surprised if he'd give you the time of day. OTOH, pimp-slapping a libelous ******, I wouldn't put him above
that. Can't say for sure. Only time will tell.