Wolf3101;846783; said:
Odd that the large number of fluval 405's on my tanks work perfectly while the two Eheims lasted less than a week before having to be returned.
One LFS in fact has 35 404's running and 10 of the newer 405's. They sell all brands and could easilly have used any of them.
Besides having the only chip controled motor and twice the flow rate of anything in its class it has more capacity than they do as well, bio and/or mechanical.
Again... Check your information. The FX5 has all that foam, which is primarily a mechanical media. Eheim 2076 and 2078 both are chip controlled pumps. The eheim 2262 is a 2260 with a pump that pushes 900gph, which is the same claim as an FX5.
check this link In that link, the FX5 is reduced from the 3500 lph rated, to 1991 lph. The eheim pro 3 only boasts 1700 lph, but gets 1200lph. Eheims are known for their pumps that don't slow down easily. The 2262 is without question an output filter, and will out perform the fx5 in output. The FX5 only houses 25 L of foam, and 6 liters of bio-media, to the 2080s 12L of bio, 2 liters of foam, or the 2260s 18L of bio.
The Fx5 by the way is far more than simply a mechanical filter.
It isn't a simple mech filter, but its primary function, and design was for mechanical filtration.
My point to all of this is that BEST is a very relitive term. It's better and more constructive to just give personal expierances and technical data when available and avoid the old...this rules and thats junk line because its what you've heard.
I have experience with fluval's full line, and much of eheim's line. You might want to research well, before you make statements like that. The FX5 has a design to be a mech filter, and operates as such. I have experience owning, or operating the FX5, 405, 404, 304, 403, eheim 2217, 2260, 2080, 2076, 2078, 2028, 2026, 2215, 2236, rena xp1, xp3, ca-1000, and cascade 1500. I have tried many of the canisters out there, and speak from experience, as well as common sense.