Chemtrails

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Have you ever researched the vietnam war beyond your wikipedia sites?
 
Citrinellus;4230402; said:
Have you ever researched the vietnam war beyond your wikipedia sites?

i normally dont use wiki links...im using it now because if i post some unknown source nobody would believe it because its not "creditable" and as you can see theres lots of people thinking im crazy. so i used the wiki link. nowadays people wont believe things unless its on the big stream media's such as fox cnn wiki etc..theres lots of other sites that talks about it you just gotta search.
 
nikond70s;4230433; said:
i normally dont use wiki links...im using it now because if i post some unknown source nobody would believe it because its not "creditable" and as you can see theres lots of people thinking im crazy. so i used the wiki link. nowadays people wont believe things unless its on the big stream media's such as fox cnn wiki etc..theres lots of other sites that talks about it you just gotta search.

I actually dislike wiki, I prefer sites that is dedicated to a single oriented idea. Not broad encyclopedia-like sites.
 
meghanashley;4229437; said:
Huge real estate prospects, sale of those buildings closed a month before (not saying I really buy that) but I was disappointed that Silverstein filed a lawsuit against the airlines for damages done to the building, that was pretty douche.

Who knows, its uncomprehenible to me, but it's very odd for a steel frame building to fall from fire, especially one that wasn't buring that long.

Intense heat caused by the burning jet fuel in an enclosed space made the steel warp, twist and fail. Pretty much a no brainer.
 
Knowdafish;4230897; said:
Intense heat caused by the burning jet fuel in an enclosed space made the steel warp, twist and fail. Pretty much a no brainer.

lol you're an great example of the typical american that believed the official story that the media tells you. theres so many evidence out there some i posted yet your still in denial haha.

i think the no brainer is yourself. steel melts in about 2500-3000 Fahrenheit. i dont know the exact numbers but its there give or take. the jet fuels werent hot enough to melt steel. the fire werent even burning correctly you can tell by the black smoke. even *if* the so call jet fuel caused it to collapse....why did the buildings fall from the bottom up? not to mention the speed it fell...and how perfectly it fell in tack...not even a lil bit of tilting but yet straight down. if it was really due to fire it would take longer than 10 seconds to fall.

see for yourself. one of many vids you can look up

[YT]<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gIUEnUJdcOA&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gIUEnUJdcOA&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>[/YT]
 
nikond70s;4231081; said:
lol you're an great example of the typical american that believed the official story that the media tells you. theres so many evidence out there some i posted yet your still in denial haha.

i think the no brainer is yourself. steel melts in about 2500-3000 Fahrenheit. i dont know the exact numbers but its there give or take. the jet fuels werent hot enough to melt steel. the fire werent even burning correctly you can tell by the black smoke. even *if* the so call jet fuel caused it to collapse....why did the buildings fall from the bottom up? not to mention the speed it fell...and how perfectly it fell in tack...not even a lil bit of tilting but yet straight down. if it was really due to fire it would take longer than 10 seconds to fall.

see for yourself. one of many vids you can look up

[YT]<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gIUEnUJdcOA&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gIUEnUJdcOA&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>[/YT]

I never said the steel melted. It twisted and warped under load from the heat! You might want to take a debating class or maybe better yet a Physics class!! :D

"Why did the buildings fall from the bottom up"? From the bottom up? That's a new one! :ROFL::ROFL::ROFL:

Ever use a hammer? A really BIG hammer? When all of the upper most floors collapsed that is in essence what happened! Think about it!
(If possible! :ROFL:)

Yup! A no brainer.....

unless you care to believe the highly illogical conspiracy theories!! :ROFL:
 
nikond70s;4231081; said:
lol you're an great example of the typical american that believed the official story that the media tells you. theres so many evidence out there some i posted yet your still in denial haha.

i think the no brainer is yourself. steel melts in about 2500-3000 Fahrenheit. i dont know the exact numbers but its there give or take. the jet fuels werent hot enough to melt steel. the fire werent even burning correctly you can tell by the black smoke. even *if* the so call jet fuel caused it to collapse....why did the buildings fall from the bottom up? not to mention the speed it fell...and how perfectly it fell in tack...not even a lil bit of tilting but yet straight down. if it was really due to fire it would take longer than 10 seconds to fall.

see for yourself. one of many vids you can look up

yeah... steel under stress of a skyscraper, the momentum of a boeing 747 ( min weight: 358,000lbs, cruising speed of 555 mph,(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_747) and leverage...

what's the foundations look like after that? it's not going to be sunshine and lollypops.
 
Knowdafish;4231130; said:
I never said the steel melted. It twisted and warped under load from the heat! You might want to take a debating class or maybe better yet a Physics class!! :D

"Why did the buildings fall from the bottom up"? From the bottom up? That's a new one! :ROFL::ROFL::ROFL:

Ever use a hammer? A really BIG hammer? When all of the upper most floors collapsed that is in essence what happened! Think about it!
(If possible! :ROFL:)

Yup! A no brainer.....

unless you care to believe the highly illogical conspiracy theories!! :ROFL:

yup. aside from the fact that a plane hit it crumbling the foundations. it's all about leverage... hit the top it's going to unsettle the bottom.
 
nikond70s;4231081; said:
lol you're an great example of the typical american that believed the official story that the media tells you. theres so many evidence out there some i posted yet your still in denial haha.

i think the no brainer is yourself. steel melts in about 2500-3000 Fahrenheit. i dont know the exact numbers but its there give or take. the jet fuels werent hot enough to melt steel. the fire werent even burning correctly you can tell by the black smoke. even *if* the so call jet fuel caused it to collapse....why did the buildings fall from the bottom up? not to mention the speed it fell...and how perfectly it fell in tack...not even a lil bit of tilting but yet straight down. if it was really due to fire it would take longer than 10 seconds to fall.

see for yourself. one of many vids you can look up

[YT]<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gIUEnUJdcOA&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gIUEnUJdcOA&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>[/YT]

The steel doesnt need to melt to become structurally unstable. Under that much strain and heat warped the steel and caused structural failure
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com