Thalan;4236213; said:Ok I watched all four aaaand Im calling you crazy. Heres a few reasons why:
Who are these experts giving imiginary lectures? Have you been to one? Have you verified any of their credentials? Have you met them?
All these "experts" saying the building was designed to withstand x or its impossible for y to happen are full of it. Nothing like this had ever happened and they have no data to base their theories on. Sure a bomber hit the ESB but that was in 1945! We're talking bare bones prop plane running on a diesel engine!
Never EVER base anything on eyewitness accounts. "It was like BOOM a bomb went off" is not an expert opinion and under the stress of the moment a piece of furniture falling over could seem like a bomb to these people. They're not combat vets used to the difference in sounds between collisions and explosions. My car door closing has been interpreted as a car accident by people standing nearby, Im not kidding. I drive an old car with long heavy metal doors that dont have much insulation in them anymore. I was accused of hitting someones car in a parking lot because someone walking by heard me shut my door and the person I parked next to apparently had damage.
:57 sec of part 3 it says that the dust cloud is not typical of a steel building collapsing without explosives but gives absolutely no evidence to support that. Add to that the fact that in EVERY controlled demolition they show the building seems to disappear into the ground. The bottom gives out and it folds in on itself. The Towers are the complete opposite! They crumble top down.
Who is this Scott Forbes guy they rely so heavily on in part 3? Why has he not been all over the news in the years since making these claims and why is his "interview" over a crappy phone line? Why is there no video interview?
References in part 4 to the "Pull it" orders are most likely the FD saying get out and give up on containing it not some nefarious code to bring the building down.
They again go to a phone conversation with an "expert" to confirm that "pull it" is demolitions lingo but how do we know that this person is who he says he is or that the supposed ID is the expert he claims to be. This one not only lacks video but fails to even put a face to the name.
If the Govt is so ruthless as to kill thousands of its own citizens, topple what is essentially a monument to American accomplishment, and destroy the economy, and skilled enough to set it all up without anyone having proof, (all to get some gold that MIGHT have been there) whats to stop them from erasing anyone from speaking out about it? Why are these people still alive and their crap spread all over the internet?
If you simply must believe that bombs were used to destroy the building why is it so hard to imagine that they were planted by terrorists? Why do you immeadiately assume the American govt did it?
My point is, give a camera, an editing system, a dozen or so actors, heaps of footage and spooky music and I can make you believe ANYTHING was a conspiracy.
Have a delusional day!
Well said! Maybe if I had taken good notes while watching those crap videos I could have been as articulate!

