Chemtrails

  • We are currently upgrading MFK. thanks! -neo
Thalan;4241598;4241598 said:
The burden of truth does not rest with those making reasonable claims. If you say that it was an inside job it requires a great deal more evidence than it would to go with the accepted version of events. If you were only saying that more went on than we know about, then yeah the videos could raise some questions, but if you want to point your finger at a specific party you better be able to back it up with a lot more than conjecture. Its as though you decided who was guilty and then went looking for evidence to support that idea rather than the other way around. Dont believe the official story? Fine. Think theres more that were not being told? Fine. Making a HUGE leap to say that the govt did it? Crazy. Look for the truth instead of trying to bend it into what you want to believe.
Good post , its nice to see someone using common sense for a change.
 
I believe that we do not know the whole truth on some of those listed on the top ten list. "Big pharm" does not have your best interest above their pocket book, but do I buy that they make people sick ????, I do believe that they can create hype/ fears in their best interest. I believe in aliens its makes much more sense to me that they do exist rather than not. Satanisim ... pretty much as scary to me as any religion (speaking in terms of fanatics), not really sure why that even made the list. The Kenedys' deaths definitely. Here is a link of some articles to read (pro- paranoid), I also read wikileaks to feed my crazy

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7529

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7529
 
yeah some of those are true
(moon, kennedy) the bettles thing is odd though
 
oh i have lots of crazy stories left.

sure plane's hit the towers and made it fall. lets talk about the pentagon now. hmmm official story says a plane hit it. where is the evidence that a plane hit it? ill see what you guys have to say before i show my side of evidence. i already posted a vid from the previous page.
 
nikond70s;4259623; said:
oh i have lots of crazy stories left.

sure plane's hit the towers and made it fall. lets talk about the pentagon now. hmmm official story says a plane hit it. where is the evidence that a plane hit it? ill see what you guys have to say before i show my side of evidence. i already posted a vid from the previous page.

Here we go again! :D

Hmmmm...... a plane going hundreds of miles per hour full of jet fuel leaves very little physical evidence, as far as any remains of the plane, when hitting a heavily reinforced with steel concrete building!

How can one "prove" evidence of the "no plane theory" when the evidence is obliterated? !!!!
 
i should of been more clear. theres no doubt something hit the pentagon. but do i buy the official story that a 757 hit the pentagon? no i dont.
 
Knowdafish;4259808; said:
Here we go again! :D

Hmmmm...... a plane going hundreds of miles per hour full of jet fuel leaves very little physical evidence, as far as any remains of the plane, when hitting a heavily reinforced with steel concrete building!

How can one "prove" evidence of the "no plane theory" when the evidence is obliterated? !!!!
Because the evidence has never, ever been obliterated before.. Never

There was absolutely nothing to even suggest a plane crash.
 
Aqua Sanctuary;4261746; said:
Because the evidence has never, ever been obliterated before.. Never

There was absolutely nothing to even suggest a plane crash.


you and i brother. but wait?! it was all over the news!!!! they said a 757 plane hit it! so it has to be true. watch the news peoples!!
 
MonsterFishKeepers.com